netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Cc: Kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:36:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200210231536.24269.roy@karlsbakk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200210231309.g9ND9Bp03373@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>

> >
> > 905182 total                                      0.4741
> > 121426 csum_partial_copy_generic                474.3203
>
> Well, maybe take a look at this func and try to optimize it?

I don't know assembly that good - sorry.

> >  93633 default_idle                             1800.6346
> >  74665 do_wp_page                               111.1086
>
> What's this?

do_wp_page is Defined as a function in: mm/memory.c

comments from the file:

/*
 * This routine handles present pages, when users try to write
 * to a shared page. It is done by copying the page to a new address
 * and decrementing the shared-page counter for the old page.
 *
 * Goto-purists beware: the only reason for goto's here is that it results
 * in better assembly code.. The "default" path will see no jumps at all.
 *
 * Note that this routine assumes that the protection checks have been
 * done by the caller (the low-level page fault routine in most cases).
 * Thus we can safely just mark it writable once we've done any necessary
 * COW.
 *
 * We also mark the page dirty at this point even though the page will
 * change only once the write actually happens. This avoids a few races,
 * and potentially makes it more efficient.
 *
 * We hold the mm semaphore and the page_table_lock on entry and exit
 * with the page_table_lock released.
 */

>
> >  65857 ide_intr                                 184.9916
>
> You have 1 ide_intr per 2 csum_partial_copy_generic... hmmm...
> how large is your readahead? I assume you'd like to fetch
> more sectors from ide per interrupt. (I hope you do DMA ;)

doing DMA - RAID-0 with 1MB chunk size on 4 disks.

> >  53636 handle_IRQ_event                         432.5484
> >  21973 do_softirq                               107.7108
> >  20498 e1000_intr                               244.0238
>
> I know zero about networking, but why 120 000 csum_partial_copy_generic
> and inly 20 000 nic interrupts? That may be abnormal.

sorry
I don't know

-- 
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester
ProntoTV AS - http://www.pronto.tv/
Tel: +47 9801 3356

Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-23 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-23 10:18 tuning linux for high network performance? Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-10-23 11:06 ` [RESEND] " Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-10-23 13:01   ` bert hubert
2002-10-23 13:21     ` David S. Miller
2002-10-23 13:42       ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-10-23 17:01         ` bert hubert
2002-10-23 17:10           ` Ben Greear
2002-10-23 17:11           ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-10-23 17:12           ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-10-23 17:56             ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-10-23 18:07               ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-10-23 18:30                 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-10-24  4:11         ` David S. Miller
2002-10-24  9:37           ` Karen Shaeffer
2002-10-24 10:30           ` sendfile64() anyone? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?) Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-10-24 10:47             ` David S. Miller
2002-10-24 11:07               ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-10-23 13:41     ` [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance? Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-10-23 14:59     ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-10-23 15:26       ` O_DIRECT sockets? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?) Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-10-23 16:34         ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-10-24 10:14           ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-10-24 10:46             ` David S. Miller
2002-10-23 18:01   ` [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance? Denis Vlasenko
2002-10-23 13:36     ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [this message]
2002-10-24 16:22       ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-10-24 11:50         ` Russell King
2002-10-24 12:42           ` bert hubert
2002-10-24 17:41           ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-10-25 11:36             ` Csum and csum copyroutines benchmark Denis Vlasenko
2002-10-25  7:48               ` Momchil Velikov
2002-10-25 13:59                 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-10-25  9:47                   ` Momchil Velikov
2002-10-25 10:19                   ` Alan Cox
2002-10-25 16:00                     ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-10-23 14:52     ` [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance? Nivedita Singhvi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200210231536.24269.roy@karlsbakk.net \
    --to=roy@karlsbakk.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).