From: Marc Boucher <marc@mbsi.ca>
To: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>, jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>,
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@gnu.org>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH,RFC] explicit connection confirmation
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 06:56:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021108115603.GA9925@endlich.mbsi.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021108115205.GA20549@outpost.ds9a.nl>
it would also be useful for transparent proxying. presently
all connections diverted to a proxy are immediately accepted,
regardless of whether the second connection (proxy->real destination)
succeeds or not.
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 12:52:05PM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 06:22:00AM -0500, jamal wrote:
>
> > > There was a thread about this in private mail round April this year,
> > > in which some good points were raised.
> >
> > There are some good points; however, whats the app for this feature?
>
> This came up a long time ago on bugtraq in a discussion how to easily
> prevent certain IP addresses from DoSsing your TCP daemon. Right now,
> userspace is always forced to complete the threeway handshake, and can only
> then close the socket.
>
> Even rather small amounts of SYN packets can thus easily saturate a server
> which has decided to handle only 100 connections AND has decided to ignore a
> certain IP address. Some inetd superservers contain code to ratelimit IP
> addresses which sadly is not as effective from userspace as it could be with
> the ability to RST a connection immediately.
>
> It also allows userspace to simulate that a service isn't even there,
> without root capabilities.
>
> Regards,
>
> bert
>
> --
> http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services
> http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-08 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-07 9:32 [PATCH,RFC] explicit connection confirmation Lennert Buytenhek
2002-11-07 11:27 ` bert hubert
2002-11-07 12:09 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2002-11-07 13:36 ` jamal
2002-11-07 15:27 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2002-11-08 11:22 ` jamal
2002-11-08 11:52 ` bert hubert
2002-11-08 11:56 ` Marc Boucher [this message]
2002-11-08 18:28 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2002-11-07 13:49 ` bert hubert
2002-11-07 14:30 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2002-11-07 16:24 ` bert hubert
2003-08-14 13:11 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2003-08-25 11:09 ` Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021108115603.GA9925@endlich.mbsi.ca \
--to=marc@mbsi.ca \
--cc=ahu@ds9a.nl \
--cc=buytenh@gnu.org \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).