From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: kazunori@miyazawa.org
Cc: usagi-core@linux-ipv6.org, Kazunori.Miyazawa@jp.yokogawa.com,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: (usagi-core 11926) Re: [PATCH] IPv6 IPsec support
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:27:44 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030219.132744.105180654.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030219233915.130a26e3.kazunori@miyazawa.org>
From: Kazunori MIyazawa <kazunori@miyazawa.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 23:39:15 +0900
> 3) I noticed comment above transformation from
> explicit dst->output() call to dst_output().
>
> It is not IPSEC issue, rather I believe that entire tree should
> have this conversion eventually. The concept of stackable
> destination cache entries is a generic one.
>
Please let me understand. I think dst->output calls each dst
output routine chains but those could not process the return value
NET_XMIT_BYPASS returned from ah and/or esp.
Is this out of scope of IPsec?
Not really. Stackable destinations are a powerful concept.
For example, we could reimplement IPIP processing using this.
In this way, IP tunnels can become stacked destinations.
Another application of stackable destinatins could be something
like CIPE.
Please understand what NET_XMIT_BYPASS means, which is "please
continue to invoke input/output method, I have placed new dst in skb"
I will apply the patch from Yoshfuji which makes the transformations.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-19 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-19 4:48 [PATCH] IPv6 IPsec support Kazunori MIyazawa
2003-02-19 4:50 ` David S. Miller
2003-02-19 5:10 ` Kunihiro Ishiguro
2003-02-19 5:17 ` Mitsuru KANDA / 神田 充
2003-02-19 5:58 ` Kazunori Miyazawa
2003-02-19 5:30 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-02-19 5:57 ` Kunihiro Ishiguro
2003-02-19 7:02 ` David S. Miller
2003-02-19 9:13 ` Kunihiro Ishiguro
2003-02-19 7:13 ` David S. Miller
2003-02-19 7:33 ` David S. Miller
2003-02-19 14:39 ` (usagi-core 11926) " Kazunori MIyazawa
2003-02-19 21:27 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-02-19 16:56 ` Mitsuru KANDA / 神田 充
2003-02-19 21:43 ` David S. Miller
2003-02-19 23:10 ` Kunihiro Ishiguro
2003-02-20 0:37 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030219.132744.105180654.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=Kazunori.Miyazawa@jp.yokogawa.com \
--cc=kazunori@miyazawa.org \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=usagi-core@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).