From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com
Cc: terje.eggestad@scali.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: anyone ever done multicast AF_UNIX sockets?
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 10:56:46 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030303.105646.02089773.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E63A8CB.2090307@nortelnetworks.com>
From: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 14:11:07 -0500
I haven't done UDP bandwidth testing--I need to check how lmbench
did it for the unix socket and do the same for UDP. Local TCP was
far slower than unix sockets though.
That result is system specific and depends upon how the data and
datastructures hit the cpu cachelines in the kernel.
TCP bandwidth is slightly faster than AF_UNIX bandwidth on my
sparc64 boxes for example.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-03 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-27 20:09 anyone ever done multicast AF_UNIX sockets? Chris Friesen
2003-02-27 22:21 ` Greg Daley
2003-02-28 13:33 ` jamal
2003-02-28 14:39 ` Chris Friesen
2003-03-01 3:18 ` jamal
2003-03-02 6:03 ` Chris Friesen
2003-03-02 14:11 ` jamal
2003-03-03 18:02 ` Chris Friesen
2003-03-03 12:51 ` Terje Eggestad
2003-03-03 12:35 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-03 17:09 ` Chris Friesen
2003-03-03 16:55 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-03 18:07 ` Chris Friesen
2003-03-03 17:56 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-03 19:11 ` Chris Friesen
2003-03-03 18:56 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-03-03 19:42 ` Terje Eggestad
2003-03-03 21:32 ` Chris Friesen
2003-03-03 23:38 ` Terje Eggestad
2003-03-03 19:39 ` Terje Eggestad
2003-03-03 22:29 ` Chris Friesen
2003-03-03 23:29 ` Terje Eggestad
2003-03-04 2:38 ` jamal
[not found] <3E5E7081.6020704@nortelnetworks.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030228083009.Y53276@shell.cyberus.ca.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3E5F748E.2080605@nortelnetworks.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030228212309.C57212@shell.cyberus.ca.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3E619E97.8010508@nortelnetworks.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030302081916.S61365@shell.cyberus.ca.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3E6398C4.2020605@nortelnetworks.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-03-03 18:18 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030303.105646.02089773.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=terje.eggestad@scali.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).