netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Chris Dukes <pakrat@www.uk.linux.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Make ipconfig.c work as a loadable module.
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:29:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030307142920.F17492@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030307133812.A6676@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>; from pakrat@www.uk.linux.org on Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:38:13PM +0000

On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:38:13PM +0000, Chris Dukes wrote:
> You are asserting aesthetics instead of benefits.  I asked about benefits.
> Specifically, what is the benefit of compact?

Think _embedded_.  Think "cost of flash chips".  Think "not everything
has a floppy disk".

> I'm sure you have a very good technical or business benefit to compact, 

I'm sorry, believe it or not, but I'm not swayed by "business benefits"
here.  Although I have my own business in the UK, we as a business are
currently involved in hardware design which has nothing to do with the
points I'm raising here.

> but those of us in the world of workstations and servers have zero clue 
> what it may be.

Indeed and understandable.

> User space solution is not the same as a solution implemented with
> multiple user space apps.

I've been working on klibc to work towards providing such a solution.
I know what it involves, and I know that this solution isn't there yet.
Also, the fundamentals of klibc have not been accepted by Linus, so we
don't even know if this is going to be a solution yet.

> > Note: I *do* agree that ipconfig.c needs to die before 2.6 but I do not
> > agree that today is the right day.
> 
> Perhaps you could explain why today is not the day.
> (ie, soon to be shipping product that requires it.  desire to see a viable
> userspace solution working before it is removed).

Just about every ARM kernel development downloads kernels via XMODEM
and the ability to bring networking up and mount a NFS-root filesystem
is by fair the easiest way to develop on *any* embedded device with
Ethernet.

I suppose you could say I have a _community_ interest here - an interest
in ensuring that the ARM community has the resources to be able to continue
using Linux.

So, while the big server people run around removing functionality they
don't need, they make other parts of the community suffer.  Is that
really what Open Source is about?  Suffering? 8)

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-07 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-06 21:10 Make ipconfig.c work as a loadable module Robin Holt
2003-03-06 22:34 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-06 22:11   ` Jeff Garzik
2003-03-06 22:25     ` Russell King
2003-03-06 22:32       ` Jeff Garzik
2003-03-07  0:13       ` Alan Cox
2003-03-06 23:19         ` Russell King
2003-03-07  0:29           ` Alan Cox
2003-03-07  0:08             ` Russell King
2003-03-07  1:29               ` Chris Dukes
2003-03-07  9:42                 ` Russell King
2003-03-07 11:46                   ` Bogdan Costescu
2003-03-08  2:03                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-03-08 10:45                       ` Bogdan Costescu
2003-03-08 16:07                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-03-08 16:19                           ` Russell King
2003-03-08 16:48                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-03-08 17:05                               ` Russell King
2003-03-08 18:01                                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-03-07 13:38                   ` Chris Dukes
2003-03-07 14:29                     ` Russell King [this message]
2003-03-07 16:23                       ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-03-07 21:47                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-07 22:00                     ` Chris Friesen
2003-03-07  7:15             ` Michael Mueller
2003-03-07 12:54               ` Alan Cox
2003-03-07 21:33                 ` Michael Mueller
2003-03-09  4:46                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-03-07  9:10             ` Denis Vlasenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030307142920.F17492@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=holt@sgi.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=pakrat@www.uk.linux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).