netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Intel 1000 MT slow to restart
@ 2003-03-26 22:31 Patrick R. McManus
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patrick R. McManus @ 2003-03-26 22:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev

I'm running intel's e1000 driver (versions 4.4.12 and tried 4.6.11)
for a 1000/MT (dual) nic on a 2.4.19 kernel.

for normal operations, everything is fine.. however if I do a 
"ifconfig eth0 down; ifconfig eth0 up" 20 or 30 seconds passes where I
can't do any traffic. the ifconfig up comes back quickly, and ifconfig
reports the driver as up (and netlink thinks its up if I try and add
another one).. I just can't move any traffic. no rx's and my tx's only
move counters in the driver - they don't actually make it to the
wire. 

if I do "ifconfig eth0 down; sleep 30; ifconfig eth0 up" all is well
immediately after the up.. The driver doesn't seem to be doing
anything different in either case - its as if the NIC itself is
enforcing some kind of quiet period. 

I'm really writing to see if I'm crazy and hoping someone else can
corroborate this is what they've seen too.

help?

-Patrick

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: Intel 1000 MT slow to restart
@ 2003-04-02  4:19 Feldman, Scott
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Feldman, Scott @ 2003-04-02  4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick R. McManus, netdev

> I'm running intel's e1000 driver (versions 4.4.12 and tried 
> 4.6.11) for a 1000/MT (dual) nic on a 2.4.19 kernel.
> 
> for normal operations, everything is fine.. however if I do a 
> "ifconfig eth0 down; ifconfig eth0 up" 20 or 30 seconds 
> passes where I can't do any traffic. the ifconfig up comes 
> back quickly, and ifconfig reports the driver as up (and 
> netlink thinks its up if I try and add another one).. I just 
> can't move any traffic. no rx's and my tx's only move 
> counters in the driver - they don't actually make it to the wire. 
> 
> if I do "ifconfig eth0 down; sleep 30; ifconfig eth0 up" all 
> is well immediately after the up.. The driver doesn't seem to 
> be doing anything different in either case - its as if the 
> NIC itself is enforcing some kind of quiet period. 
> 
> I'm really writing to see if I'm crazy and hoping someone 
> else can corroborate this is what they've seen too.

Do you have spanning tree turned on on your switch?  This could cause
such delays.

-scott

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: Intel 1000 MT slow to restart
@ 2003-04-02 12:53 Hen, Shmulik
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hen, Shmulik @ 2003-04-02 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Feldman, Scott, Patrick R. McManus, netdev



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Feldman, Scott 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 7:19 AM
> To: Patrick R. McManus; netdev@oss.sgi.com
> Subject: RE: Intel 1000 MT slow to restart
> 
> 
> > I'm running intel's e1000 driver (versions 4.4.12 and tried 
> > 4.6.11) for a 1000/MT (dual) nic on a 2.4.19 kernel.
> > 
> > for normal operations, everything is fine.. however if I do a 
> > "ifconfig eth0 down; ifconfig eth0 up" 20 or 30 seconds 
> > passes where I can't do any traffic. the ifconfig up comes 
> > back quickly, and ifconfig reports the driver as up (and 
> > netlink thinks its up if I try and add another one).. I just 
> > can't move any traffic. no rx's and my tx's only move 
> > counters in the driver - they don't actually make it to the wire. 
> > 
> > if I do "ifconfig eth0 down; sleep 30; ifconfig eth0 up" all 
> > is well immediately after the up.. The driver doesn't seem to 
> > be doing anything different in either case - its as if the 
> > NIC itself is enforcing some kind of quiet period. 
> > 
> > I'm really writing to see if I'm crazy and hoping someone 
> > else can corroborate this is what they've seen too.
> 
> Do you have spanning tree turned on on your switch?  This could cause
> such delays.
> 
> -scott
> 

We've also seen this behavior with certain switches (e.g. Extreme Networks
Summit 7i) even with STP turned off.
The switch simply delays traffic for ~30sec after link was restored. I
believe this delay is configurable.

	Shmulik.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-02 12:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-26 22:31 Intel 1000 MT slow to restart Patrick R. McManus
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-02  4:19 Feldman, Scott
2003-04-02 12:53 Hen, Shmulik

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).