From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_pppox: create module infrastructure for protocol modules Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 04:12:19 -0300 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20030429071218.GP25361@conectiva.com.br> References: <20030429061227.GJ25361@conectiva.com.br> <20030428.222728.48508327.davem@redhat.com> <20030429.154651.108798316.yoshfuji@wide.ad.jp> <20030428.230045.21906184.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: yoshfuji@wide.ad.jp, mostrows@speakeasy.net, netdev@oss.sgi.com, maxk@qualcomm.com Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030428.230045.21906184.davem@redhat.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Em Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 11:00:45PM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu: > From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ > Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:46:51 +0900 (JST) > > We probably need to refer IPv4 module as well as IPv6 module > because of the IPv4-Mapped address feature for IPv6 sockets. > > Right. This kind of subtlety is perfectly solved with the scheme now in DaveM's tree for pppox, as the net family layer is where this kinds of special cases are better handled. I'll take a look at this and will try to come up with a patch. - Arnaldo