From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: acenic lockup
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 13:27:35 -0400
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <20030508132735.J22565@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
References: <200305072221.CAA00973@mops.inr.ac.ru> <20030508.090049.48375778.davem@redhat.com> <20030508131135.G22565@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20030508.090954.94579344.davem@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, anton@samba.org, jes@trained-monkey.org,
   netdev@oss.sgi.com
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030508.090954.94579344.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:09:54AM -0700
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:09:54AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
>    From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
>    Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 13:11:35 -0400
>    
>    P.S. Can you please email @pobox.com for stuff that is not Red Hat
>    specific?
>    
> My apologies, I will do this in the future.
> 
> How much will this affect latency though? :-)

Should improve it :)  I didn't check my redhat.com email all weekend
this past weekend, for example.

	Jeff