Dump of TCP hang in established state

netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* Dump of TCP hang in established state
@ 2003-05-13 15:51 Martin Josefsson
  2003-05-14  9:08 ` James Morris
  2003-05-29  9:41 ` David S. Miller
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Martin Josefsson @ 2003-05-13 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 909 bytes --]

Hi

from 2.6 must-fix list

- There are those mysterious TCP hangs of established state sockets. 
  Someone has to get a good log in order for us to effectively debug this.

I think this is what I've seen a few times when using distcc.
Client (x.x.x.x) is running 2.5.67 and server (y.y.y.y) is running
2.4.20

There's a router in between with sometimes clogged interfaces so there
is some packetloss and the hang looks related to this.

When the hangs happen there's a lot of data sitting in send-q on the
client. The connections continues a few seconds after the timer has
expired iirc.

I've included two tcpdumps of these hangs. I've included everything from
the beginning of the connections, gzipped. It should be quite easy to
see when the hang happened, just look for a large jump in the
timestamps.

If more details are needed I can try to reproduce it again, shouldn't be
too difficult.

-- 
/Martin

[-- Attachment #2: stall-57682-anon.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 7328 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: stall-57798-anon.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 2501 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: Dump of TCP hang in established state
  2003-05-13 15:51 Dump of TCP hang in established state Martin Josefsson
@ 2003-05-14  9:08 ` James Morris
  2003-05-21 17:19   ` Nivedita Singhvi
  2003-05-29  9:41 ` David S. Miller
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: James Morris @ 2003-05-14  9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Josefsson; +Cc: netdev

On 13 May 2003, Martin Josefsson wrote:

> - There are those mysterious TCP hangs of established state sockets. 
>   Someone has to get a good log in order for us to effectively debug this.
> 
> I think this is what I've seen a few times when using distcc.

Does anyone know if the other hangs are seen when the app is using 
TCP_CORK (like distcc does) ?


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@intercode.com.au>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: Dump of TCP hang in established state
  2003-05-14  9:08 ` James Morris
@ 2003-05-21 17:19   ` Nivedita Singhvi
  2003-05-21 19:31     ` Martin Josefsson
  2003-05-21 23:10     ` David S. Miller
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Nivedita Singhvi @ 2003-05-21 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Morris; +Cc: Martin Josefsson, netdev

James Morris wrote:

>>- There are those mysterious TCP hangs of established state sockets. 
>>  Someone has to get a good log in order for us to effectively debug this.
>>
>>I think this is what I've seen a few times when using distcc.
> 
> Does anyone know if the other hangs are seen when the app is using 
> TCP_CORK (like distcc does) ?

We had observed some hangs during SpecWeb99 benchmark runs.
Unfortunately, we managed to burn down the machine and have
yet to rerun the benchmark. No other workload seems to
be observing them.

I'm trying to excavate the one incomplete trace I had of
that hang, if possible. IIRC it was using sendfile(), so
probably also using TCP_CORK, though dont know that for
sure.

Can anyone tell me what to do to reproduce this?

Also, I'd like to have this tracked in bugzilla, if noone
objects (DaveM?), so we dont lose it..I had dropped some earlier
reports of hangs. I'll file in BUGME..

thanks,
Nivedita

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: Dump of TCP hang in established state
  2003-05-21 17:19   ` Nivedita Singhvi
@ 2003-05-21 19:31     ` Martin Josefsson
  2003-05-21 18:58       ` Nivedita Singhvi
  2003-05-21 19:39       ` Martin Josefsson
  2003-05-21 23:10     ` David S. Miller
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Martin Josefsson @ 2003-05-21 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nivedita Singhvi; +Cc: James Morris, netdev

On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 19:19, Nivedita Singhvi wrote:

> >>I think this is what I've seen a few times when using distcc.
> > 
> > Does anyone know if the other hangs are seen when the app is using 
> > TCP_CORK (like distcc does) ?
> 
> We had observed some hangs during SpecWeb99 benchmark runs.
> Unfortunately, we managed to burn down the machine and have
> yet to rerun the benchmark. No other workload seems to
> be observing them.
> 
> I'm trying to excavate the one incomplete trace I had of
> that hang, if possible. IIRC it was using sendfile(), so
> probably also using TCP_CORK, though dont know that for
> sure.
> 
> Can anyone tell me what to do to reproduce this?

I've now tried my distcc stuff again. With TCP_CORK enabled I don't have
any problem reproducing the hangs, 1 in 3 shows at least one hang. But
so far I havn't been able to reproduce it with TCP_CORK disabled. I'll
keep compiling a few more times, I've only run 10 compilations so far.

When using distcc you know you have a hang when it stops at the
object-linking for a while waiting for one process to finish.

-- 
/Martin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: Dump of TCP hang in established state
  2003-05-21 19:31     ` Martin Josefsson
@ 2003-05-21 18:58       ` Nivedita Singhvi
  2003-05-21 19:54         ` Martin Josefsson
  2003-05-21 19:39       ` Martin Josefsson
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Nivedita Singhvi @ 2003-05-21 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Josefsson; +Cc: James Morris, netdev

Martin Josefsson wrote:

>>Can anyone tell me what to do to reproduce this?
> 
> I've now tried my distcc stuff again. With TCP_CORK enabled I don't have
> any problem reproducing the hangs, 1 in 3 shows at least one hang. But
> so far I havn't been able to reproduce it with TCP_CORK disabled. I'll
> keep compiling a few more times, I've only run 10 compilations so far.
> 
> When using distcc you know you have a hang when it stops at the
> object-linking for a while waiting for one process to finish.
> 

Thanks, Martin..

Which kernels are you currently using?
Were you able to reproduce this with 2.5.69 at both
ends?

I just took a look at your previous trace. I'n not absolutely
sure my previous report of a hang is the same issue, only because
in that case the connection did not revive, whereas in your
case after the 1 second approximate stall, it continues..
(havent stepped through everything yet).

thanks,
Nivedita

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: Dump of TCP hang in established state
  2003-05-21 18:58       ` Nivedita Singhvi
@ 2003-05-21 19:54         ` Martin Josefsson
  2003-05-21 19:59           ` Nivedita Singhvi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Martin Josefsson @ 2003-05-21 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nivedita Singhvi; +Cc: James Morris, netdev

On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 20:58, Nivedita Singhvi wrote:
> Martin Josefsson wrote:
> 
> >>Can anyone tell me what to do to reproduce this?
> > 
> > I've now tried my distcc stuff again. With TCP_CORK enabled I don't have
> > any problem reproducing the hangs, 1 in 3 shows at least one hang. But
> > so far I havn't been able to reproduce it with TCP_CORK disabled. I'll
> > keep compiling a few more times, I've only run 10 compilations so far.
> > 
> > When using distcc you know you have a hang when it stops at the
> > object-linking for a while waiting for one process to finish.
> > 
> 
> Thanks, Martin..
> 
> Which kernels are you currently using?
> Were you able to reproduce this with 2.5.69 at both
> ends?

I'm using 2.5.69-mm5 on the client and 2.4.20 and 2.4.21-rc1 on the
servers. Also seen with 2.5.67 and earlier on the client.

I did run 2.4.19 on the client and never saw this problem with that
kernel.

I can't test 2.5 kernels on the servers since they are actually routers
located a fair bit away from here so I do not want to test 2.5 on them
just yet.

> I just took a look at your previous trace. I'n not absolutely
> sure my previous report of a hang is the same issue, only because
> in that case the connection did not revive, whereas in your
> case after the 1 second approximate stall, it continues..
> (havent stepped through everything yet).

I don't get a 1 second stall, I get a long stall, around 2 minutes and
then when the timer (seen with netstat -o) on the clientside expires it
continues like nothing happened. So it's not fatal, just very irritating
when using distcc to speed up compiles and then you end up having to
wait :)

-- 
/Martin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: Dump of TCP hang in established state
  2003-05-21 19:54         ` Martin Josefsson
@ 2003-05-21 19:59           ` Nivedita Singhvi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Nivedita Singhvi @ 2003-05-21 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Josefsson; +Cc: James Morris, netdev

Martin Josefsson wrote:

> I don't get a 1 second stall, I get a long stall, around 2 minutes and

yep, that was a typo on my part..meant 1 min.. :)

thanks,
Nivedita

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: Dump of TCP hang in established state
  2003-05-21 19:31     ` Martin Josefsson
  2003-05-21 18:58       ` Nivedita Singhvi
@ 2003-05-21 19:39       ` Martin Josefsson
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Martin Josefsson @ 2003-05-21 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nivedita Singhvi; +Cc: James Morris, netdev

On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 21:31, Martin Josefsson wrote:

> I've now tried my distcc stuff again. With TCP_CORK enabled I don't have
> any problem reproducing the hangs, 1 in 3 shows at least one hang. But
> so far I havn't been able to reproduce it with TCP_CORK disabled. I'll
> keep compiling a few more times, I've only run 10 compilations so far.

And of course I just got a hang without TCP_CORK just after sending the
mail.... sigh.

I'll see if I can get my tcpdump working with mmap-enabled libpcap
again...

-- 
/Martin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: Dump of TCP hang in established state
  2003-05-21 17:19   ` Nivedita Singhvi
  2003-05-21 19:31     ` Martin Josefsson
@ 2003-05-21 23:10     ` David S. Miller
  2003-05-22  0:35       ` Nivedita Singhvi
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2003-05-21 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: niv; +Cc: jmorris, gandalf, netdev

   From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>
   Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 10:19:30 -0700
   
   Also, I'd like to have this tracked in bugzilla, if noone
   objects (DaveM?),

It won't get lost, I maintain a web page privately amongst
the main net developers that I use to track TODO items, and it
is there.

Please don't make a bugzilla for this.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: Dump of TCP hang in established state
  2003-05-21 23:10     ` David S. Miller
@ 2003-05-22  0:35       ` Nivedita Singhvi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Nivedita Singhvi @ 2003-05-22  0:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller; +Cc: jmorris, gandalf, netdev

David S. Miller wrote:

> It won't get lost, I maintain a web page privately amongst
> the main net developers that I use to track TODO items, and it
> is there.
> 
> Please don't make a bugzilla for this.

No problem :)

thanks,
Nivedita

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: Dump of TCP hang in established state
  2003-05-13 15:51 Dump of TCP hang in established state Martin Josefsson
  2003-05-14  9:08 ` James Morris
@ 2003-05-29  9:41 ` David S. Miller
  2003-05-29 14:03   ` Martin Josefsson
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2003-05-29  9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gandalf; +Cc: netdev

   From: Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>
   Date: 13 May 2003 17:51:31 +0200
   
   If more details are needed I can try to reproduce it again,
   shouldn't be too difficult.

Can you reproduce this with the latest and greatest 2.5.x
sources?  I think we might have just nailed it...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: Dump of TCP hang in established state
  2003-05-29  9:41 ` David S. Miller
@ 2003-05-29 14:03   ` Martin Josefsson
  2003-05-29 19:57     ` Martin Josefsson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Martin Josefsson @ 2003-05-29 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller; +Cc: netdev

On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 11:41, David S. Miller wrote:
>    From: Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>
>    Date: 13 May 2003 17:51:31 +0200
>    
>    If more details are needed I can try to reproduce it again,
>    shouldn't be too difficult.
> 
> Can you reproduce this with the latest and greatest 2.5.x
> sources?  I think we might have just nailed it...

I'll give it a spin later this evening if time permits.

-- 
/Martin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: Dump of TCP hang in established state
  2003-05-29 14:03   ` Martin Josefsson
@ 2003-05-29 19:57     ` Martin Josefsson
  2003-05-29 21:50       ` Nivedita Singhvi
  2003-05-29 21:54       ` David S. Miller
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Martin Josefsson @ 2003-05-29 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller; +Cc: netdev

On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 16:03, Martin Josefsson wrote:

> > Can you reproduce this with the latest and greatest 2.5.x
> > sources?  I think we might have just nailed it...
> 
> I'll give it a spin later this evening if time permits.

I've just tested 2.5-bk and I can still reproduce it.
The wording of my mail might have been a bit wrong, I don't see complete
hangs, just ~2 minute stalls in ESTABLISHED state and then it continues
like nothing happened.

-- 
/Martin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: Dump of TCP hang in established state
  2003-05-29 19:57     ` Martin Josefsson
@ 2003-05-29 21:50       ` Nivedita Singhvi
  2003-05-29 21:52         ` David S. Miller
  2003-05-29 21:54       ` David S. Miller
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Nivedita Singhvi @ 2003-05-29 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Josefsson; +Cc: David S. Miller, netdev

Martin Josefsson wrote:

> I've just tested 2.5-bk and I can still reproduce it.
> The wording of my mail might have been a bit wrong, I don't see complete
> hangs, just ~2 minute stalls in ESTABLISHED state and then it continues
> like nothing happened.
> 

This actually addresses a situation of memory corruption
and illegal reference panics, correct? And should potentially
fix such issues or other seeming weirdnesses that might be
happening in both sendmsg() and sendfile() code paths? Any other
symptoms or particulars? I'm wondering if this addresses
might explain some other bugs we have run into (not
identified as TCP yet)?

thanks,
Nivedita

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: Dump of TCP hang in established state
  2003-05-29 21:50       ` Nivedita Singhvi
@ 2003-05-29 21:52         ` David S. Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2003-05-29 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: niv; +Cc: gandalf, netdev

   From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>
   Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 14:50:08 -0700

   Martin Josefsson wrote:

   > I've just tested 2.5-bk and I can still reproduce it.
   > The wording of my mail might have been a bit wrong, I don't see complete
   > hangs, just ~2 minute stalls in ESTABLISHED state and then it continues
   > like nothing happened.
   > 

   This actually addresses a situation of memory corruption
   and illegal reference panics, correct?

It prevents TCP input from "reading" bogus memory when comparing
time_wait buckets to the saddr/sport/daddr/dport of an incoming
packet.

By bogus memory I mean it's some large offset from the base of the
struct tcp_tw_bucket structure, past it's end.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: Dump of TCP hang in established state
  2003-05-29 19:57     ` Martin Josefsson
  2003-05-29 21:50       ` Nivedita Singhvi
@ 2003-05-29 21:54       ` David S. Miller
  2003-05-29 22:00         ` Martin Josefsson
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2003-05-29 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gandalf; +Cc: netdev

   From: Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>
   Date: 29 May 2003 21:57:11 +0200

   I've just tested 2.5-bk and I can still reproduce it.

Can you get a tcpdump trace at the sender side for the complete life
of the connection for which the hang occurs?

There isn't much we can do about this without a trace.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: Dump of TCP hang in established state
  2003-05-29 21:54       ` David S. Miller
@ 2003-05-29 22:00         ` Martin Josefsson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Martin Josefsson @ 2003-05-29 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller; +Cc: netdev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 537 bytes --]

On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 23:54, David S. Miller wrote:
>    From: Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>
>    Date: 29 May 2003 21:57:11 +0200
>    
>    I've just tested 2.5-bk and I can still reproduce it.
> 
> Can you get a tcpdump trace at the sender side for the complete life
> of the connection for which the hang occurs?
> 
> There isn't much we can do about this without a trace.

I've already sent the trace twice to netdev, I've attached it again.
I can reproduce it quite easily, both with TCP_CORK and without.

-- 
/Martin

[-- Attachment #2: stall-57798-anon --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 23380 bytes --]

16:02:08.643827 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: S 1626991454:1626991454(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 1466330247 0,nop,wscale 3> (DF)
16:02:08.647286 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: S 77827266:77827266(0) ack 1626991455 win 5696 <mss 1436,sackOK,timestamp 143345276 1466330247,nop,wscale 0> (DF)
16:02:08.647330 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330250 143345276> (DF)
16:02:08.906471 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 1:1425(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330509 143345276> (DF)
16:02:08.906495 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 1425:2849(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330509 143345276> (DF)
16:02:08.906517 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 2849:4273(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330509 143345276> (DF)
16:02:08.910667 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 1425 win 8544 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345302 1466330509> (DF)
16:02:08.910672 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 2849 win 11392 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345302 1466330509> (DF)
16:02:08.911239 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 4273 win 14240 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345302 1466330509> (DF)
16:02:09.060689 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 4273:5697(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330664 143345302> (DF)
16:02:09.060714 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 5697:7121(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330664 143345302> (DF)
16:02:09.060738 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 7121:8545(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330664 143345302> (DF)
16:02:09.060754 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 8545:9969(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330664 143345302> (DF)
16:02:09.060772 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 9969:11393(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330664 143345302> (DF)
16:02:09.060785 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 11393:12817(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330664 143345302> (DF)
16:02:09.064187 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 7121 win 19936 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345317 1466330664> (DF)
16:02:09.064192 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 5697 win 17088 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345317 1466330664> (DF)
16:02:09.064194 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 8545 win 22784 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345317 1466330664> (DF)
16:02:09.064451 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 9969 win 25632 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345317 1466330664> (DF)
16:02:09.064454 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 11393 win 28480 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345317 1466330664> (DF)
16:02:09.064456 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 12817 win 31328 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345317 1466330664> (DF)
16:02:09.170403 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 12817:14241(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330773 143345317> (DF)
16:02:09.170418 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 14241:15665(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330773 143345317> (DF)
16:02:09.170430 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 15665:17089(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330773 143345317> (DF)
16:02:09.170451 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 17089:18513(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330773 143345317> (DF)
16:02:09.170464 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 18513:19937(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330773 143345317> (DF)
16:02:09.170482 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 19937:21361(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330773 143345317> (DF)
16:02:09.170496 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 21361:22785(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330773 143345317> (DF)
16:02:09.170513 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 22785:24209(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330773 143345317> (DF)
16:02:09.170528 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 24209:25633(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330773 143345317> (DF)
16:02:09.170546 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 25633:27057(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330773 143345317> (DF)
16:02:09.170560 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 27057:28481(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330773 143345317> (DF)
16:02:09.174188 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 14241 win 34176 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345328 1466330773> (DF)
16:02:09.174529 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 15665 win 37024 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345328 1466330773> (DF)
16:02:09.174533 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 17089 win 39872 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345328 1466330773> (DF)
16:02:09.174535 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 18513 win 42720 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345328 1466330773> (DF)
16:02:09.175157 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 19937 win 45568 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345328 1466330773> (DF)
16:02:09.175160 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 21361 win 48416 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345328 1466330773> (DF)
16:02:09.175178 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 22785 win 51264 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345328 1466330773> (DF)
16:02:09.175383 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 24209 win 54112 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345328 1466330773> (DF)
16:02:09.175422 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 25633 win 56960 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345328 1466330773> (DF)
16:02:09.175696 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 27057 win 59808 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345328 1466330773> (DF)
16:02:09.175731 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 28481 win 62656 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345329 1466330773> (DF)
16:02:09.178274 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 28481:29905(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330781 143345328> (DF)
16:02:09.178302 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 29905:31329(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330781 143345328> (DF)
16:02:09.178326 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 31329:32753(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330781 143345328> (DF)
16:02:09.178374 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 32753:34177(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330781 143345328> (DF)
16:02:09.178395 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 34177:35601(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330781 143345328> (DF)
16:02:09.178415 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 35601:37025(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330781 143345328> (DF)
16:02:09.178435 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 37025:38449(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330781 143345328> (DF)
16:02:09.178453 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 38449:39873(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330781 143345328> (DF)
16:02:09.178472 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 39873:41297(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330781 143345328> (DF)
16:02:09.178490 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 41297:42721(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330781 143345328> (DF)
16:02:09.178509 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 42721:44145(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330781 143345328> (DF)
16:02:09.178528 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 44145:45569(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330781 143345329> (DF)
16:02:09.181333 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 29905 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345329 1466330781> (DF)
16:02:09.182086 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 31329 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345329 1466330781> (DF)
16:02:09.182139 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 32753 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345329 1466330781> (DF)
16:02:09.182151 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 35601 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345329 1466330781> (DF)
16:02:09.182583 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 38449 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345329 1466330781> (DF)
16:02:09.182587 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 41297 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345329 1466330781> (DF)
16:02:09.183271 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 44145 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345329 1466330781> (DF)
16:02:09.215723 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 45569 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345333 1466330781> (DF)
16:02:09.330622 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 45569:46993(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330934 143345329> (DF)
16:02:09.330645 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 46993:48417(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330934 143345329> (DF)
16:02:09.330664 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 48417:49841(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330934 143345329> (DF)
16:02:09.330678 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 49841:51265(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330934 143345329> (DF)
16:02:09.330696 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 51265:52689(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330934 143345329> (DF)
16:02:09.330709 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 52689:54113(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330934 143345329> (DF)
16:02:09.330727 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 54113:55537(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330934 143345329> (DF)
16:02:09.330740 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 55537:56961(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330934 143345329> (DF)
16:02:09.330760 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 56961:58385(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330934 143345329> (DF)
16:02:09.330775 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 58385:59809(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330934 143345329> (DF)
16:02:09.330794 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 59809:61233(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330934 143345329> (DF)
16:02:09.330806 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 61233:62657(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330934 143345329> (DF)
16:02:09.330823 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 62657:64081(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466330934 143345333> (DF)
16:02:09.333999 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 48417 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345344 1466330934> (DF)
16:02:09.334363 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 51265 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345344 1466330934> (DF)
16:02:09.334622 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 54113 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345344 1466330934> (DF)
16:02:09.335094 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 56961 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345344 1466330934> (DF)
16:02:09.335356 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 59809 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345344 1466330934> (DF)
16:02:09.335839 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 62657 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345345 1466330934> (DF)
16:02:09.375666 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 64081 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345349 1466330934> (DF)
16:02:09.438879 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 64081:65505(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331042 143345344> (DF)
16:02:09.438892 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 65505:66929(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331042 143345344> (DF)
16:02:09.438911 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 66929:68353(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331042 143345344> (DF)
16:02:09.438924 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 68353:69777(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331042 143345344> (DF)
16:02:09.438943 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 69777:71201(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331042 143345344> (DF)
16:02:09.438958 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 71201:72625(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331042 143345344> (DF)
16:02:09.438976 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 72625:74049(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331042 143345344> (DF)
16:02:09.438989 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 74049:75473(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331042 143345344> (DF)
16:02:09.439008 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 75473:76897(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331042 143345344> (DF)
16:02:09.439022 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 76897:78321(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331042 143345344> (DF)
16:02:09.439041 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 78321:79745(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331042 143345345> (DF)
16:02:09.439054 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 79745:81169(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331042 143345345> (DF)
16:02:09.439071 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 81169:82593(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331042 143345349> (DF)
16:02:09.443513 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 66929 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345355 1466331042> (DF)
16:02:09.443823 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 69777 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345355 1466331042> (DF)
16:02:09.444319 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 72625 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345355 1466331042> (DF)
16:02:09.444680 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 75473 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345355 1466331042> (DF)
16:02:09.444770 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 78321 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345355 1466331042> (DF)
16:02:09.444899 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 81169 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345355 1466331042> (DF)
16:02:09.445460 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 82593:84017(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331048 143345355> (DF)
16:02:09.445481 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 84017:85441(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331048 143345355> (DF)
16:02:09.445501 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 85441:86865(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331048 143345355> (DF)
16:02:09.445514 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 86865:88289(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331048 143345355> (DF)
16:02:09.445531 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 88289:89713(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331048 143345355> (DF)
16:02:09.445583 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 89713:91137(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331048 143345355> (DF)
16:02:09.445597 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 91137:92561(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331049 143345355> (DF)
16:02:09.445616 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 92561:93985(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331049 143345355> (DF)
16:02:09.445629 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 93985:95409(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331049 143345355> (DF)
16:02:09.445650 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 95409:96833(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331049 143345355> (DF)
16:02:09.445665 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 96833:98257(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331049 143345355> (DF)
16:02:09.445683 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 98257:99681(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331049 143345355> (DF)
16:02:09.445695 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 99681:101105(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331049 143345355> (DF)
16:02:09.451822 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 84017 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345356 1466331042> (DF)
16:02:09.452573 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 86865 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345356 1466331048> (DF)
16:02:09.452740 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 89713 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345356 1466331048> (DF)
16:02:09.452989 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 92561 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345356 1466331048> (DF)
16:02:09.453352 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 95409 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345356 1466331049> (DF)
16:02:09.454195 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 98257 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345356 1466331049> (DF)
16:02:09.454400 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 101105 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345356 1466331049> (DF)
16:02:09.597688 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 101105:102529(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331201 143345356> (DF)
16:02:09.597702 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 102529:103953(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331201 143345356> (DF)
16:02:09.597721 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 103953:105377(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331201 143345356> (DF)
16:02:09.597734 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 105377:106801(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331201 143345356> (DF)
16:02:09.597755 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 106801:108225(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331201 143345356> (DF)
16:02:09.597768 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 108225:109649(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331201 143345356> (DF)
16:02:09.597787 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 109649:111073(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331201 143345356> (DF)
16:02:09.597800 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 111073:112497(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331201 143345356> (DF)
16:02:09.597818 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 112497:113921(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331201 143345356> (DF)
16:02:09.597832 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 113921:115345(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331201 143345356> (DF)
16:02:09.597849 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 115345:116769(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331201 143345356> (DF)
16:02:09.597862 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 116769:118193(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331201 143345356> (DF)
16:02:09.597903 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 118193:119617(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331201 143345356> (DF)
16:02:09.597915 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 119617:121041(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331201 143345356> (DF)
16:02:09.610011 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 103953 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345372 1466331201> (DF)
16:02:09.610486 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 106801 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345372 1466331201> (DF)
16:02:09.610899 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 109649 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345372 1466331201> (DF)
16:02:09.611921 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345372 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 1 {113921:115345} > (DF)
16:02:09.611944 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345372 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 1 {113921:116769} > (DF)
16:02:09.611963 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345372 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 1 {113921:118193} > (DF)
16:02:09.611996 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345372 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 1 {113921:119617} > (DF)
16:02:09.703860 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 121041:122465(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331307 143345372> (DF)
16:02:09.703873 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 122465:123889(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331307 143345372> (DF)
16:02:09.703892 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 123889:125313(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331307 143345372> (DF)
16:02:09.703908 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 125313:126737(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331307 143345372> (DF)
16:02:09.703926 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 126737:128161(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331307 143345372> (DF)
16:02:09.703939 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 128161:129585(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331307 143345372> (DF)
16:02:09.705559 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 129585:131009(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331307 143345372> (DF)
16:02:09.705565 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 131009:132433(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331307 143345372> (DF)
16:02:09.705570 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 132433:133857(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331307 143345372> (DF)
16:02:09.705574 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 133857:135281(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331307 143345372> (DF)
16:02:09.705578 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 135281:136705(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331307 143345372> (DF)
16:02:09.714200 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345382 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 2 {121041:122465}{113921:119617} > (DF)
16:02:09.714499 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345382 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 2 {121041:123889}{113921:119617} > (DF)
16:02:09.714698 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345382 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 2 {121041:125313}{113921:119617} > (DF)
16:02:09.714772 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345382 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 2 {121041:126737}{113921:119617} > (DF)
16:02:09.715358 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345382 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 2 {121041:128161}{113921:119617} > (DF)
16:02:09.715361 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345382 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 2 {121041:129585}{113921:119617} > (DF)
16:02:09.715550 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345382 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 2 {121041:131009}{113921:119617} > (DF)
16:02:09.715552 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345382 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 2 {121041:132433}{113921:119617} > (DF)
16:02:09.715672 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345383 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 2 {121041:133857}{113921:119617} > (DF)
16:02:09.715675 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345383 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 2 {121041:135281}{113921:119617} > (DF)
16:02:09.715677 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345383 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 2 {121041:136705}{113921:119617} > (DF)
16:02:09.808712 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 136705:138129(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331412 143345382> (DF)
16:02:09.808735 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 138129:139548(1419) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331412 143345382> (DF)
16:02:09.808784 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 111073:112497(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331412 143345382> (DF)
16:02:09.808813 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 112497:113921(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331412 143345382> (DF)
16:02:09.808838 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 119617:121041(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466331412 143345383> (DF)
16:02:09.822496 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345393 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 2 {121041:138129}{113921:119617} > (DF)
16:02:09.822498 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 111073 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143345393 1466331201,nop,nop,sack sack 2 {121041:139548}{113921:119617} > (DF)
16:04:24.936079 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 111073:112497(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466466560 143345393> (DF)
16:04:24.938582 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 112497 win 62656 <nop,nop,timestamp 143358906 1466466560,nop,nop,sack sack 2 {121041:139548}{113921:119617} > (DF)
16:04:24.939909 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: P 112497:113921(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466466563 143358906> (DF)
16:04:24.939937 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . 119617:121041(1424) ack 1 win 730 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466466563 143358906> (DF)
16:04:24.942568 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 119617 win 55536 <nop,nop,timestamp 143358906 1466466563,nop,nop,sack sack 1 {121041:139548} > (DF)
16:04:24.942573 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 139548 win 46992 <nop,nop,timestamp 143358906 1466466563> (DF)
16:04:25.038755 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: P 1:1166(1165) ack 139548 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143358916 1466466563> (DF)
16:04:25.038765 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: F 1166:1166(0) ack 139548 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143358916 1466466563> (DF)
16:04:25.038893 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: . ack 1166 win 1019 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466466662 143358916> (DF)
16:04:25.039286 x.x.x.x.57798 > y.y.y.y.3632: F 139548:139548(0) ack 1167 win 1019 <nop,nop,timestamp 1466466663 143358916> (DF)
16:04:25.041470 y.y.y.y.3632 > x.x.x.x.57798: . ack 139549 win 64080 <nop,nop,timestamp 143358916 1466466663> (DF)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-29 22:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-13 15:51 Dump of TCP hang in established state Martin Josefsson
2003-05-14  9:08 ` James Morris
2003-05-21 17:19   ` Nivedita Singhvi
2003-05-21 19:31     ` Martin Josefsson
2003-05-21 18:58       ` Nivedita Singhvi
2003-05-21 19:54         ` Martin Josefsson
2003-05-21 19:59           ` Nivedita Singhvi
2003-05-21 19:39       ` Martin Josefsson
2003-05-21 23:10     ` David S. Miller
2003-05-22  0:35       ` Nivedita Singhvi
2003-05-29  9:41 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-29 14:03   ` Martin Josefsson
2003-05-29 19:57     ` Martin Josefsson
2003-05-29 21:50       ` Nivedita Singhvi
2003-05-29 21:52         ` David S. Miller
2003-05-29 21:54       ` David S. Miller
2003-05-29 22:00         ` Martin Josefsson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).