From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove sdla from setup.c Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 12:36:25 -0300 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20030529153625.GP24054@conectiva.com.br> References: <20030528110658.GA26411@lst.de> <20030529.025749.59658664.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: hch@lst.de, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030529.025749.59658664.davem@redhat.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Em Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:57:49AM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu: > From: Christoph Hellwig > Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 13:06:58 +0200 > > sdla had calls from both Space.c and setup.c. Leave the Space.c one > alone as per previous discussion but move over the setup.c one to > initcalls. (and remove the prototype for a third one from setup.c!) > > Looks ok, applied. > > Some of this wan driver stuff is so crappy :( Crappy? You are being nice... What about this: void lock_adapter_irq(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *smp_flags) { spin_lock_irqsave(lock, *smp_flags); } Why the hell do we need a bogus wrapper for something so standard? :-( - Arnaldo