From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: rddunlap@osdl.org
Cc: david-b@pacbell.net, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: netlink tester program
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 20:51:56 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030602.205156.08346169.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33060.4.64.196.31.1054612172.squirrel@www.osdl.org>
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 20:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
> It's the one that works for _me_ and Alexey and myself, and we're
> the ones doing all the work.
Do you want it to remain that way?
Doesn't matter to _us_, _we_ know how these things work
and how to use them. If we don't, we'll read the code to
learn this.
Other's care, and if someone writes the docs for _them_,
that is _fine_.
What I object to is "hey we have to have docs, why didn't
dave and alexey write them". :)
Franks a lot,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-03 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-30 16:00 netlink tester program Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-31 0:11 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-31 3:22 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-31 6:42 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-31 12:09 ` Andi Kleen
2003-06-02 17:07 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-06-02 21:04 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-06-02 21:56 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 1:56 ` David Brownell
2003-06-03 2:02 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 3:34 ` David Brownell
2003-06-03 3:38 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 3:49 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-06-03 3:51 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-06-03 7:57 ` Hisham Kotry
2003-06-09 1:35 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-09 14:37 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-09 17:16 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 2:33 ` John S. Denker
2003-06-03 2:38 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 3:20 ` John S. Denker
2003-06-03 3:22 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 3:41 ` John S. Denker
2003-06-03 3:46 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 3:54 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-06-03 3:54 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-03 3:37 ` David Brownell
2003-06-03 3:32 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-06-03 3:35 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030602.205156.08346169.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).