From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Kirby Subject: Re: Route cache performance under stress Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 00:13:30 -0700 Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030609071330.GD20613@netnation.com> References: <20030608.225837.115923841.davem@redhat.com> <001801c32e50$57ef0750$4a00000a@badass> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "'David S. Miller'" , hadi@shell.cyberus.ca, fw@deneb.enyo.de, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: CIT/Paul Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001801c32e50$57ef0750$4a00000a@badass> List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:28:30AM -0400, CIT/Paul wrote: > OK so let's try this.. If you can show me a linux router can can route > 100mbps or more of juno-z.101f.c attack without dropping packets I will > be thoroughly impressed :) > > I am willing to test out any code/patches and settings that you can > think of and post some results.. I'll see if I can set up a test bed this week. I think we should already be able to do close to this, but I'll let the numbers will do the talking. :) In the tests I've been doing so far, I've been dropping responses (in the INPUT chain), so I haven't been testing the forwarding through of packets (though it is testing the routing input). I'll see if I can set up a router, target, and DoS box. I haven't been able to get juno-z.101f.c to saturate 100 Mbit/sec outgoing, but I've only tried it on eepro100 boxes. Has anybody got it to send more? Mmm, need more tg3 cards... Simon-