From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Subject: RE: Route cache performance under stress Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 20:03:19 -0400 (EDT) Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030609195652.E35696@shell.cyberus.ca> References: <008001c32eda$56760830$4a00000a@badass> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: 'Simon Kirby' , "'David S. Miller'" , fw@deneb.enyo.de, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: CIT/Paul In-Reply-To: <008001c32eda$56760830$4a00000a@badass> List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, CIT/Paul wrote: > NAPI despises SMP.. Any SMP box we run NAPI on has major packet loss > under high load.. So I find that the e1000 ITR works just as well > And there is no reason for NAPI at this point. > Foo, you on cheap crack again? Please just try the tests as described if you want to help. It doesnt help anyone when you wildly wave your hands like that. Why dont we take you offline - give me access to your machine i have a couple of hours to kill. cheers, jamal