From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jamal Hadi <hadi@shell.cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: Route cache performance under stress
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 07:01:36 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20030610070045.N37047@shell.cyberus.ca>
References: <008001c32eda$56760830$4a00000a@badass> <20030609195652.E35696@shell.cyberus.ca>
 <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306092006420.12038@ns.istop.com> <20030609204257.L35799@shell.cyberus.ca>
 <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306092200150.28167@ns.istop.com> <20030610043453.GC23009@netnation.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: ralph+d@istop.com, "netdev@oss.sgi.com" <netdev@oss.sgi.com>,
	"linux-net@vger.kernel.org" <linux-net@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org>
To: Simon Kirby <sim@netnation.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030610043453.GC23009@netnation.com>
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org



On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Simon Kirby wrote:

> Anyway, the performance issues should be fixable.  It is going to take
> some work, but there seem to be some interested people.  I'm going to try
> to set up something that will allow for easy comparisons of patches so
> that we can measure progress, and perhaps reach an eventual goal.
>


Now heres the right spirit.

cheers,
jamal