From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: niv@us.ibm.com
Cc: anton@samba.org, haveblue@us.ibm.com, hdierks@us.ibm.com,
scott.feldman@intel.com, dwg@au1.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, milliner@us.ibm.com,
ricardoz@us.ibm.com, twichell@us.ibm.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 22:36:34 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030613.223634.74746570.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EEAAFA6.9080609@us.ibm.com>
From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 22:16:22 -0700
Yep, but it really doesn't have too many options (sic pun ;))..
i.e. The max the options can add are 40 bytes, speaking
strictly TCP, not IP. This really should fit into one extra
cacheline for most architectures, at most, right?
It's what the bottom of the header is aligned to, but
we build the packet top to bottom not the other way around.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-14 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <OF0078342A.E131D4B1-ON85256D44.0051F7C0@pok.ibm.com>
2003-06-13 16:21 ` e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4) Dave Hansen
2003-06-13 22:38 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-06-13 22:46 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-13 23:18 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-06-14 1:52 ` Lincoln Dale
2003-06-14 5:41 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-14 5:52 ` Lincoln Dale
2003-06-14 6:08 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-14 6:14 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-14 6:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-06-14 17:08 ` Greg KH
2003-06-15 3:01 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-14 5:16 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2003-06-14 5:36 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-06-13 17:03 Herman Dierks
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-13 23:52 Feldman, Scott
2003-06-13 23:52 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-14 0:55 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-06-14 1:34 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-14 0:03 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-06-15 14:32 Herman Dierks
2003-06-15 14:40 Herman Dierks
2003-06-15 14:44 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-16 16:17 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2003-06-16 18:21 Feldman, Scott
2003-06-16 18:30 ` Dave Hansen
2003-06-16 18:56 Feldman, Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030613.223634.74746570.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=dwg@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hdierks@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=milliner@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ricardoz@us.ibm.com \
--cc=scott.feldman@intel.com \
--cc=twichell@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).