From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Kirby <sim@netnation.com>
Subject: Re: Route cache performance tests
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:27:50 -0700
Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20030616232750.GD18484@netnation.com>
References: <20030616223714.GB18484@netnation.com> <20030616.154401.132900800.davem@redhat.com> <20030616230922.GC18484@netnation.com> <20030616.160856.35828947.davem@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: ralph+d@istop.com, hadi@shell.cyberus.ca, xerox@foonet.net,
	fw@deneb.enyo.de, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030616.160856.35828947.davem@redhat.com>
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 04:08:56PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:

> It depends upon the first patch that I enclosed.

Never mind. :)  Such patches don't work very well with patch --dry.

Simon-

[        Simon Kirby        ][        Network Operations        ]
[     sim@netnation.com     ][   NetNation Communications Inc.  ]
[  Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of my employer. ]