From: Simon Kirby <sim@netnation.com>
To: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
ralph+d@istop.com, hadi@shell.cyberus.ca, xerox@foonet.net,
fw@deneb.enyo.de, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Route cache performance tests
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 14:07:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030617210700.GE25773@netnation.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030617200721.GA25773@netnation.com>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:07:21PM -0700, Simon Kirby wrote:
> Whoa. Uhm. A lot. I should compare with 2.4 again to see what's going
> on here.
>
> 60.0042 seconds passed, avg forwarding rate: 50759.683 pps
Ummmm, yeah, 2.5.71 is quite a bit slower than 2.4.21. I applied
Alexey's 2.5.71 rtcache fixes to 2.4.21 (changing "fl" to "key" in
the scoring function), and now I see:
60.0065 seconds passed, avg forwarding rate: 135379.152 pps
If reboot and don't fill the routing table:
60.0104 seconds passed, avg forwarding rate: 259027.200 pps
This is with standard juno (pseudo-random sources).
This is with CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES still on, too. I'll turn that off
and do some profiles. The only weird thing I'm seeing while doing this
is that the route cache table continues to grow slowly, and the pps
slowly falls off over a few minutes. "ip route flush cache" restores
performance again. I'll verify this is not happening in 2.5.
Simon-
[ Simon Kirby ][ Network Operations ]
[ sim@netnation.com ][ NetNation Communications Inc. ]
[ Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of my employer. ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-17 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-10 7:57 Route cache performance tests Simon Kirby
2003-06-10 11:23 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-10 20:36 ` CIT/Paul
2003-06-10 13:34 ` Ralph Doncaster
2003-06-10 13:39 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-13 6:20 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-16 22:37 ` Simon Kirby
2003-06-16 22:44 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-16 23:09 ` Simon Kirby
2003-06-16 23:08 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-16 23:27 ` Simon Kirby
2003-06-16 23:49 ` Simon Kirby
2003-06-17 15:59 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-17 16:50 ` Robert Olsson
2003-06-17 16:50 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-17 17:29 ` Robert Olsson
2003-06-17 19:06 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-17 20:12 ` Robert Olsson
2003-06-17 20:07 ` Simon Kirby
2003-06-17 20:17 ` Martin Josefsson
2003-06-17 20:37 ` Simon Kirby
2003-06-17 20:36 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-17 20:51 ` Simon Kirby
2003-06-17 20:49 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-18 5:50 ` Pekka Savola
2003-06-17 20:49 ` Robert Olsson
2003-06-17 21:07 ` Simon Kirby [this message]
2003-06-17 22:50 ` Simon Kirby
2003-06-17 23:07 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-17 22:11 ` Ralph Doncaster
2003-06-17 22:08 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030617210700.GE25773@netnation.com \
--to=sim@netnation.com \
--cc=Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
--cc=hadi@shell.cyberus.ca \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=ralph+d@istop.com \
--cc=xerox@foonet.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).