From: Jamal Hadi <hadi@shell.cyberus.ca>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Cc: Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@watson.ibm.com>,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, davem@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, fcusack@samba.org, dfs@roaringpenguin.com,
carlson@workingcode.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 12:22:35 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030625122128.V84526@shell.cyberus.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030625091531.5ebed618.shemminger@osdl.org>
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> In the long run, the right answer probably is to push the session management
> out of the daemon and into the kernel. Today the PPPoE code in the kernel
> is only half-brained, it needs pppd to survive.
>
I would think pppd is the half-brained portion ;->
Placing control protocols in the kernel is plain wrong.
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-25 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-25 7:24 [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP Rusty Russell
2003-06-25 11:19 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-25 13:21 ` Michal Ostrowski
2003-06-25 13:42 ` Michal Ostrowski
2003-06-25 15:45 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-25 17:27 ` Michal Ostrowski
2003-06-25 22:17 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-06-25 22:56 ` Michal Ostrowski
2003-06-25 16:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-06-25 16:22 ` Jamal Hadi [this message]
2003-06-25 16:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-06-25 17:07 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-25 17:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-06-25 18:00 ` Michal Ostrowski
2003-06-25 22:22 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-06-25 22:53 ` Ben Greear
2003-06-25 21:33 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-25 22:06 ` Michal Ostrowski
2003-06-26 1:04 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-26 3:57 ` Rusty Russell
2003-06-26 3:59 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-26 8:17 ` Rusty Russell
2003-06-26 8:55 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-26 10:47 ` James Carlson
2003-06-26 10:51 ` James Carlson
2003-06-26 23:18 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-27 11:39 ` James Carlson
2003-06-27 12:12 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-06-27 13:19 ` James Carlson
2003-06-27 14:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-06-27 15:27 ` James Carlson
2003-06-28 2:21 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-28 22:51 ` Frank Cusack
2003-06-26 11:37 ` Michal Ostrowski
2003-06-25 16:01 ` Jason Lunz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030625122128.V84526@shell.cyberus.ca \
--to=hadi@shell.cyberus.ca \
--cc=carlson@workingcode.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=dfs@roaringpenguin.com \
--cc=fcusack@samba.org \
--cc=mostrows@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).