From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: carlson@workingcode.com, hadi@shell.cyberus.ca, davem@redhat.com,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, netdev@oss.sgi.com, fcusack@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:59:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030627075946.7ab6f591.shemminger@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16124.13469.944716.441016@nanango.paulus.ozlabs.org>
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 22:12:13 +1000 (EST)
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote:
> James Carlson writes:
> > Jamal Hadi writes:
> > > So what about packet being loss? Wouldnt that ensure reordering?
> >
> > Please explain. What pattern of loss possibly results in one packet
> > being inserted in the stream ahead of another?
>
> Rusty asked me today what protocols there were that coped with packet
> loss but couldn't cope with reordering. I couldn't think of any. Do
> you know of any examples?
>
Does LLC allow for re-ordering?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-27 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-25 7:24 [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP Rusty Russell
2003-06-25 11:19 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-25 13:21 ` Michal Ostrowski
2003-06-25 13:42 ` Michal Ostrowski
2003-06-25 15:45 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-25 17:27 ` Michal Ostrowski
2003-06-25 22:17 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-06-25 22:56 ` Michal Ostrowski
2003-06-25 16:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-06-25 16:22 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-25 16:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-06-25 17:07 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-25 17:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-06-25 18:00 ` Michal Ostrowski
2003-06-25 22:22 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-06-25 22:53 ` Ben Greear
2003-06-25 21:33 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-25 22:06 ` Michal Ostrowski
2003-06-26 1:04 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-26 3:57 ` Rusty Russell
2003-06-26 3:59 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-26 8:17 ` Rusty Russell
2003-06-26 8:55 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-26 10:47 ` James Carlson
2003-06-26 10:51 ` James Carlson
2003-06-26 23:18 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-27 11:39 ` James Carlson
2003-06-27 12:12 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-06-27 13:19 ` James Carlson
2003-06-27 14:59 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2003-06-27 15:27 ` James Carlson
2003-06-28 2:21 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-28 22:51 ` Frank Cusack
2003-06-26 11:37 ` Michal Ostrowski
2003-06-25 16:01 ` Jason Lunz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030627075946.7ab6f591.shemminger@osdl.org \
--to=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=carlson@workingcode.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=fcusack@samba.org \
--cc=hadi@shell.cyberus.ca \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).