From: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, greearb@candelatech.com,
mbligh@aracnet.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:45:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030629214558.GA15089@win.tue.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030629.141528.74734144.davem@redhat.com>
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 02:15:28PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> Date: 28 Jun 2003 00:04:30 +0100
>
> You are assuming there is a relationship in bug severity/commonness
> and number of *developers* who hit it.
>
> Not true, the assumption I make is that a bug report that
> a bug reporter cares about, and a patch that a patch submitter
> cares about, will all get resent if they get dropped.
>
> If the reporter/submitter doesn't care, neither do I.
You are right, but only in the part where you say that this
is the best, indeed the only, way you can work.
Alan is right, information is important, and a lot of it is
submitted only once. (And a lot of it is submitted three times
and ignored three times.)
Suppose you find a gcc bug, construct a small example that
is mistranslated and send it off to the gcc list. Maybe even
include a fix. Will you babysit them, check whether later snapshots
correct this flaw, resubmit your report every month if not?
Maybe you will. I certainly don't - send the report and that's it.
Andries
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-29 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-27 5:30 networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org David S. Miller
2003-06-27 5:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-27 5:47 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 7:59 ` Matti Aarnio
2003-06-27 8:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 15:00 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-27 14:34 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-27 14:56 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-27 21:37 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 21:54 ` Ben Greear
2003-06-27 21:54 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 22:15 ` Ben Greear
2003-06-27 22:19 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 22:36 ` Ben Greear
2003-06-28 0:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-28 0:15 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-28 0:32 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-28 0:19 ` Larry McVoy
2003-06-28 0:27 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-28 19:20 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-29 0:44 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-27 23:08 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-28 0:21 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-28 19:19 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-28 22:03 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-28 23:15 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-28 23:20 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-28 23:46 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-12 17:07 ` Jan Rychter
2003-07-13 5:22 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-13 5:42 ` Jan Rychter
2003-06-27 23:12 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-27 22:02 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-27 21:31 ` Ben Collins
2003-06-27 23:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-27 22:30 ` Ben Collins
2003-06-28 0:32 ` Larry McVoy
2003-06-28 19:26 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-28 0:38 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-28 1:14 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-28 2:13 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-28 2:35 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-28 6:08 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-28 3:27 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-27 22:02 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 22:11 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-27 22:13 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 18:50 ` Ben Greear
2003-06-27 21:44 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 22:47 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-27 22:53 ` Larry McVoy
2003-06-28 0:44 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-28 0:09 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 23:04 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-28 0:19 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-29 21:15 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-29 21:45 ` Andries Brouwer [this message]
2003-06-29 21:51 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-29 22:49 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-06-29 23:21 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-29 22:07 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-29 22:13 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-30 2:35 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-20 16:46 ` Petr Baudis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-27 15:25 John Bradford
2003-06-28 8:00 John Bradford
2003-06-28 8:10 John Bradford
2003-06-28 22:37 John Bradford
2003-06-29 22:28 John Bradford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030629214558.GA15089@win.tue.nl \
--to=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).