From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: CaT Subject: Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 01:58:02 +1000 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20030710155802.GF1722@zip.com.au> References: <20030710154302.GE1722@zip.com.au> <20030711.005542.04973601.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, pekkas@netcore.fi Return-path: To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030711.005542.04973601.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:55:42AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote: > > ip addr add 3ffe:8001:000c:ffff::37/127 dev sit1 > > ip route add ::/0 via 3ffe:8001:000c:ffff::36 > > RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument > > This is not bug, but rather misconfiguration; > you cannot use prefix::, which is mandatory subnet routers > anycast address, as unicast address. Ok. I'm a bit lost then. What should the line be then? To me the above makes sense (and used to work), but then I'm not that experienced with IPv6... -- "How can I not love the Americans? They helped me with a flat tire the other day," he said. - http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/artikkel?SearchID=73139162287496&Avis=TO&Dato=20030624&Kategori=NEWS28&Lopenr=106240111&Ref=AR