From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= Subject: Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 00:55:42 +0900 (JST) Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20030711.005542.04973601.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> References: <20030710154302.GE1722@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, pekkas@netcore.fi Return-path: To: cat@zip.com.au In-Reply-To: <20030710154302.GE1722@zip.com.au> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org In article <20030710154302.GE1722@zip.com.au> (at Fri, 11 Jul 2003 01:43:03 +1000), CaT says: > With 2.4.21-pre2 I can get a nice tunnel going over my ppp connection > and as such get ipv6 connectivity. I think went to 2.4.21 and then to > 2.4.22-pre4 and bringing up the tunnel fails as follows: : > ip addr add 3ffe:8001:000c:ffff::37/127 dev sit1 > ip route add ::/0 via 3ffe:8001:000c:ffff::36 > RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument This is not bug, but rather misconfiguration; you cannot use prefix::, which is mandatory subnet routers anycast address, as unicast address. Thank you. -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA