From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?=
 <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:39:26 +0900 (JST)
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <20030711.143926.599349332.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
References: <1057900800.3588.50.camel@hades>
	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0307110821110.24981-100000@netcore.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mika.liljeberg@welho.com, andre@tomt.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
   netdev@oss.sgi.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: pekkas@netcore.fi
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307110821110.24981-100000@netcore.fi>
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307110821110.24981-100000@netcore.fi> (at Fri, 11 Jul 2003 08:22:39 +0300 (EEST)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> says:

> (It might be nice to have configurable /proc option on whether to enable 
> the subnet router anycast address at all, but that's also a different 
> story..)

I don't like this
while I would be ok to have configuration option
not to support anycast.

--yoshfuji