From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Larry McVoy Subject: Re: TCP IP Offloading Interface Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 16:35:03 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20030713233503.GA31793@work.bitmover.com> References: <20030713004818.4f1895be.davem@redhat.com> <52u19qwg53.fsf@topspin.com> <20030713160200.571716cf.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Roland Dreier , alan@storlinksemi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030713160200.571716cf.davem@redhat.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 04:02:00PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > On send this doesn't matter, on receive you use my clever receive > buffer handling + flow cache idea to accumulate the data portion of > packets into page sized chunks for the networking to flip. Please don't. I think page flipping was a bad idea. I think you'd be better off to try and make the data flow up the stack in small enough windows that it all sits in the cache. One thing SGI taught me (not that they wanted to do so) is that infinitely large packets are infinitely stupid, for lots of reasons. One is that you have to buffer them somewhere and another is that the bigger they are the bigger your cache needs to be to go fast. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm