From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 02:53:54 -0300 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20030714055354.GP3825@conectiva.com.br> References: <20030708163042.GL23597@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <3F0B2D30.4020102@candelatech.com> <20030708212551.GL1939@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030708.150835.78728697.davem@redhat.com> <20030709161520.GW1939@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030711193215.GH16037@gtf.org> <20030711200423.GL20424@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff Garzik , netdev@oss.sgi.com, greearb@candelatech.com, "David S. Miller" Return-path: To: Matthew Wilcox Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030711200423.GL20424@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Em Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:04:23PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox escreveu: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 03:32:15PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > 1) The _ops are either too limited in scope, or too wide in scope. > > Couldn't agree more. I blame acme -- he wants me to push it to be much > wider in scope. Let's push _all_ the function pointers into netdev_ops. Hey, it was just a brainstorm session ;) Anyway, I'm heavily backlogged as I'm on a business trip for several days already, I'll try to read all this thread when I'm back home 8) - Arnaldo