From: David Korn <dgk@research.att.com>
To: davem@redhat.com
Cc: gsf@research.att.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Re: kernel bug in socketpair()
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:28:22 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307231428.KAA15254@raptor.research.att.com> (raw)
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 09:32:09 -0400 (EDT)
> David Korn <dgk@research.att.com> wrote:
>
> [ Added netdev@oss.sgi.com, the proper place to discuss networking kernel issues
> . ]
>
> > The first problem is that files created with socketpair() are not accessible
> > via /dev/fd/n or /proc/$$/fd/n where n is the file descriptor returned
> > by socketpair(). Note that this is not a problem with pipe().
>
> Not a bug.
>
> Sockets are not openable via /proc files under any circumstances,
> not just the circumstances you describe. This is a policy decision and
> prevents a whole slew of potential security holes.
>
>
Thanks for you quick response.
This make sense for INET sockets, but I don't understand the security
considerations for UNIX domain sockets. Could you please elaborate?
Moreover, /dev/fd/n, (as opposed to /proc/$$/n) is restricted to
the current process and its decendents if close-on-exec is not specified.
Again, I don't understand why this would create a security problem
either since the socket is already accesible via the original
descriptor.
Finally if this is a security problem, why is the errno is set to ENXIO
rather than EACCESS?
David Korn
dgk@research.att.com
next reply other threads:[~2003-07-23 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-23 14:28 David Korn [this message]
2003-07-23 14:46 ` kernel bug in socketpair() David S. Miller
2003-07-23 16:56 ` Glenn Fowler
2003-07-23 17:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 17:24 ` Glenn Fowler
2003-07-23 17:31 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 18:14 ` Glenn Fowler
2003-07-23 18:23 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 18:54 ` Glenn Fowler
2003-07-23 19:04 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 19:11 ` Glenn Fowler
2003-07-23 19:14 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 19:29 ` Glenn Fowler
2003-07-23 19:56 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 19:08 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-23 17:50 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-23 23:27 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-23 19:28 David Korn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200307231428.KAA15254@raptor.research.att.com \
--to=dgk@research.att.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=gsf@research.att.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).