From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [bernie@develer.com: Kernel 2.6 size increase] Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 20:13:35 +0100 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20030723201335.A27990@infradead.org> References: <20030723195355.A27597@infradead.org> <20030723195504.A27656@infradead.org> <20030723115858.75068294.davem@redhat.com> <20030723200658.A27856@infradead.org> <20030723120901.57746fd8.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030723120901.57746fd8.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 12:09:01PM -0700 Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 12:09:01PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > So basically we'd have a CONFIG_NET_XFRM, and things like > AH/ESP/IPCOMP/AH6/ESP6/IPCOMP6 would say "select NET_XFRM" > in the Kconfig where they are selected. > > Then when CONFIG_NET_XFRM is not set all the xfrm interfaces > called from non-ipsec non-xfrm source files get NOP versions. > > Is this exactly what Andi's patch did? Just send it on > so we can integrate this. I think that's what it did modula the select which IIRC wasn't available back then. But I guess I'll rather leave this to Andi. > We actually lost a lot of code in other areas of the networking, for > example Andrew Morton and I made many bogus function inlines > undone because they made the code too large. That's cool! Now we just need to find a bunch more regressions and actually make 2.6 smaller than 2.4 :) Of course that's true for the other subsystems, too.