From: "Carlos Velasco" <carlosev@newipnet.com>
To: "Carlos Velasco" <carlosev@newipnet.com>, "Julian Anastasov" <ja@ssi.bg>
Cc: "Bart De Schuymer" <bdschuym@pandora.be>, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Bug? ARP with wrong src IP address
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 20:11:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307242011420101.00BC642D@192.168.128.16> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200307241836060226.006FACEB@192.168.128.16>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii", Size: 973 bytes --]
On 24/07/2003 at 18:36 Carlos Velasco wrote:
>> There are some exceptions for the src IP. Even Linux will
>>not reply if the src IP in incoming probe matches local IP. But
>>may be only Linux preserves the src IP in outgoing probes.
Tested these platforms:
Solaris 8 -> sends src IP address of INTERFACE
Cisco -> sends src IP address of INTERFACE
Windows 2000, XP -> sends src IP address of INTERFACE
Linux 2.6.0-pre1, 2.4.20, 2.4.21 -> sends src IP address of LOOPBACK
Question: ¿What would be the implications of applying my patch or similar to do linux behave like other OS?
>Will open a TAC case tomorrow. I'm interested on testing this in Solaris.
Same tests:
Solaris 8 -> replies the ARP request
Windows 2000, XP -> replies the ARP request
Linux 2.4.21 -> replies the ARP request
Cisco -> NOT replies the ARP request
I will contact Cisco to see why they don't do and if it can be fixed in future releases.
Regards,
Carlos Velasco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-24 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-23 15:12 Bug? ARP with wrong src IP address Carlos Velasco
2003-07-23 15:25 ` Carlos Velasco
2003-07-23 23:01 ` Julian Anastasov
2003-07-23 23:34 ` Carlos Velasco
2003-07-24 9:30 ` Bart De Schuymer
2003-07-24 10:38 ` Carlos Velasco
2003-07-24 11:04 ` Julian Anastasov
2003-07-24 15:28 ` Carlos Velasco
2003-07-24 15:54 ` Julian Anastasov
2003-07-24 16:04 ` Carlos Velasco
2003-07-24 16:32 ` Julian Anastasov
2003-07-24 16:36 ` Carlos Velasco
2003-07-24 18:11 ` Carlos Velasco [this message]
2003-07-24 18:37 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-24 18:54 ` Carlos Velasco
2003-07-24 16:10 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-25 18:24 ` Carlos Velasco
2003-07-25 18:46 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-25 18:36 ` Carlos Velasco
2003-07-25 18:59 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-25 19:23 ` Carlos Velasco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200307242011420101.00BC642D@192.168.128.16 \
--to=carlosev@newipnet.com \
--cc=bdschuym@pandora.be \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).