From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: greearb@candelatech.com, jgarzik@pobox.com,
scott.feldman@intel.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: e100 "Ferguson" release
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 20:08:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030803200851.7d46a605.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F2DCE56.6030601@pacbell.net>
On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 20:09:10 -0700
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:
> David S. Miller wrote:
> >>Although I have not tried this latest patch, the existing e100 and e1000 in
> >>2.4.21 seldom seem to return true to this method: netif_queue_stopped(odev),
> >>even when the next hard_start_xmit() call fails.
> >
> >
> > Returning an error from hard_start_xmit() from normal ethernet
> > drivers is, frankly, a driver bug and should never happen.
>
> What's "normal" mean?
One that can manage it's own TX resources.
> With the current USB stack, network adapters tend to need
> memory allocations there. Those can fail, though it seems
> that's not very common. Doesn't seem like a bug, for all
> that I'd rather see the those paths be zero-alloc in 2.7.
Any particular reason why the SKB data itself can't be
mapped directly? We created all of these DMA mapping
abstractions remember? :-)
Another option is to pre-allocate, such that while the TX
queue is awake we know we have enough resources to send any
given packet. Then in ->hard_start_xmit() after using a buffer
we allocate a replacement buffer, if this fails in such a way
that a subsequent ->hard_start_xmit() could possibly fail, we
do netif_stop_queue().
Look to tg3 to see what I'm talking about in general.
netif_stop_queue() is done at the moment at which it may be possible
that we cannot accept the queueing of a TX packet. This means that
when TX entries available <= MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1, we stop the queue.
This guarentees that we will always be able to handle any packet given
to us via ->hard_start_xmit().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-04 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-03 4:34 e100 "Ferguson" release Feldman, Scott
2003-08-03 6:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-03 6:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-03 7:32 ` Ben Greear
2003-08-03 7:32 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-04 3:09 ` David Brownell
2003-08-04 3:08 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-08-04 3:45 ` David Brownell
2003-08-04 3:46 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-04 4:08 ` David Brownell
2003-08-04 4:13 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-04 17:38 ` David Brownell
2003-08-05 8:23 ` Felix Radensky
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-05 3:45 Feldman, Scott
2003-08-05 5:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-05 7:16 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-05 14:28 Feldman, Scott
2003-08-05 15:19 Feldman, Scott
2003-08-05 15:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-10 9:00 ` Felix Radensky
2003-08-05 15:44 ` Felix Radensky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030803200851.7d46a605.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=scott.feldman@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).