* Re: Fw: [PATCH] set NLM_F_MULTI in answer of RTM_GETADDR dump answer
[not found] <20030809011153.46a99ef2.davem@redhat.com>
@ 2003-08-10 3:03 ` kuznet
2003-08-10 3:47 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: kuznet @ 2003-08-10 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: hadi, netdev
Hello!
> After sending RTM_GETADDR dump request to netlink socket, received multipart
> answer does not have NLM_F_MULTI set on each message. This patch fix that.
OK.
Actually, this flag was never used because of its redundancy
it is not the only place where it is not set.
Alexey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Fw: [PATCH] set NLM_F_MULTI in answer of RTM_GETADDR dump answer
2003-08-10 3:03 ` Fw: [PATCH] set NLM_F_MULTI in answer of RTM_GETADDR dump answer kuznet
@ 2003-08-10 3:47 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2003-08-10 3:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kuznet; +Cc: hadi, netdev
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 07:03:48 +0400 (MSD)
kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> > After sending RTM_GETADDR dump request to netlink socket, received multipart
> > answer does not have NLM_F_MULTI set on each message. This patch fix that.
>
> OK.
>
> Actually, this flag was never used because of its redundancy
> it is not the only place where it is not set.
Ok, I applied the patch.
Thanks for the review Alexey.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-10 3:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20030809011153.46a99ef2.davem@redhat.com>
2003-08-10 3:03 ` Fw: [PATCH] set NLM_F_MULTI in answer of RTM_GETADDR dump answer kuznet
2003-08-10 3:47 ` David S. Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).