netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Missing break in switch statement.
@ 2003-08-11 16:48 davej
  2003-08-11 17:14 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: davej @ 2003-08-11 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev

Is this intentional? It should at least have a 
/* FALLTHROUGH */ or similar if so.

		Dave

diff -urpN --exclude-from=/home/davej/.exclude bk-linus/net/ipv6/raw.c linux-2.5/net/ipv6/raw.c
--- bk-linus/net/ipv6/raw.c	2003-07-11 13:57:41.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.5/net/ipv6/raw.c	2003-07-11 14:08:05.000000000 +0100
@@ -833,6 +833,7 @@ static int rawv6_getsockopt(struct sock 
 			val = -1;
 		else
 			val = opt->offset;
+		break;
 
 	default:
 		return -ENOPROTOOPT;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Missing break in switch statement.
  2003-08-11 16:48 [PATCH] Missing break in switch statement davej
@ 2003-08-11 17:14 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
  2003-08-12  5:26   ` David S. Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki @ 2003-08-11 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: davem, davej; +Cc: netdev, yoshfuji

In article <E19mFqr-00068T-00@tetrachloride> (at Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:48:57 +0100), davej@redhat.com says:

> Is this intentional? It should at least have a 
> /* FALLTHROUGH */ or similar if so.

Of course not.

>  		else
>  			val = opt->offset;
> +		break;
>  
>  	default:
>  		return -ENOPROTOOPT;

agreed.

--yoshfuji

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Missing break in switch statement.
  2003-08-11 17:14 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
@ 2003-08-12  5:26   ` David S. Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2003-08-12  5:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki; +Cc: davej, netdev, yoshfuji

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 02:14:14 +0900 (JST)
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@hongo.wide.ad.jp> wrote:

> In article <E19mFqr-00068T-00@tetrachloride> (at Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:48:57 +0100), davej@redhat.com says:
> 
> > Is this intentional? It should at least have a 
> > /* FALLTHROUGH */ or similar if so.
> 
> Of course not.

Patch applied, thanks David.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-12  5:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-11 16:48 [PATCH] Missing break in switch statement davej
2003-08-11 17:14 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2003-08-12  5:26   ` David S. Miller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).