From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:04:14 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20030812070414.1e8a5e63.davem@redhat.com> References: <200308121703.15567.shmulik.hen@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, laurent.deniel@thalesatm.com, jgarzik@pobox.com, bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: shmulik.hen@intel.com In-Reply-To: <200308121703.15567.shmulik.hen@intel.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 17:03:15 +0300 Shmulik Hen wrote: > > One of the great things about what Jamal spends his time working > > on is finally a strict seperation of the control layer from > > everything else. And part of this is moving all of the control > > logic into userspace. Once that is accomplished, I can have my > > toilet flush every time a TCP packet is routed through my system > > and this won't crap up the kernel. > > What scope are we talking about here ? > 2.4 ? 2.6 ? 2.7 ? other ? > Our current aim is 2.4 and 2.6. Jamal's work is longer term, I'll let him answer your other questions.