* Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves
[not found] <E791C176A6139242A988ABA8B3D9B38A0251E6B2@hasmsx403.iil.intel.com>
@ 2003-08-12 14:51 ` Shmulik Hen
2003-08-12 15:17 ` jamal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shmulik Hen @ 2003-08-12 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hadi; +Cc: David S. Miller, laurent.deniel, jgarzik, bonding-devel, netdev
On Tuesday 12 August 2003 05:29 pm, jamal wrote:
[copied from another thread]
> Some of this bonding stuff is pretty scary.
>
> You should start thinking 2.7.
>
I stand corrected. From your original replay above, I thought you
meant we're doing this all wrong for the current implementation.
> > Taking into account the two statements I made above:
> > Do you think that what we're doing right now might interfere with
> > what Jamal is suggesting ?
> > Wouldn't it be possible to do things the old way first and than
> > convert everything to the new way ?
> > Shouldn't all this be a part of a totally new project like
> > "bonding2"
>
> yes, this would be next gen - 2.7 or above target.
I read your answer, yes, but for which question :)
--
| Shmulik Hen Advanced Network Services |
| Israel Design Center, Jerusalem |
| LAN Access Division, Platform Networking |
| Intel Communications Group, Intel corp. |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves
2003-08-12 14:51 ` [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves Shmulik Hen
@ 2003-08-12 15:17 ` jamal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: jamal @ 2003-08-12 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: shmulik.hen
Cc: David S. Miller, laurent.deniel, jgarzik, bonding-devel, netdev
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 10:51, Shmulik Hen wrote:
> > > Taking into account the two statements I made above:
> > > Do you think that what we're doing right now might interfere with
> > > what Jamal is suggesting ?
No it doesnt; you can continue on that trend - this is something to chew
on.
> > > Wouldn't it be possible to do things the old way first and than
> > > convert everything to the new way ?
yes.
> > > Shouldn't all this be a part of a totally new project like
> > > "bonding2"
> >
> > yes, this would be next gen - 2.7 or above target.
>
> I read your answer, yes, but for which question :)
Typically around this time of the season - if you wanna call it that - a
new stable release is on the table being eaten(2.6.x), people start
talking at the table about what that next meal would constitute ;-> So
you didnt like the vegetables or the amount of salt added? you make it
known then. Of course you are not the cook - but in the Linux world its
ok to criticize the cook hopefully they can make a better meal next
time;->
Its also OK to criticize the food while it is being cooked.
The beauty of it is the cook doesnt listen to your feedback or doesnt
provide enough convincing why the food has so much salt, then you can
convert yourself into a cook as well and provide alternatives ;->
I hope that is a good analogy and sorry I assumed you were synced in
that 'twas that season.
cheers,
jamal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-12 15:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <E791C176A6139242A988ABA8B3D9B38A0251E6B2@hasmsx403.iil.intel.com>
2003-08-12 14:51 ` [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves Shmulik Hen
2003-08-12 15:17 ` jamal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).