From: Shmulik Hen <shmulik.hen@intel.com>
To: "Hare, Matthew" <matthew.hare@amsjv.com>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP/IP Window Size Problem/Query
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 19:05:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308121905.18313.shmulik.hen@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E791C176A6139242A988ABA8B3D9B38A0251E6BE@hasmsx403.iil.intel.com>
On Monday 11 August 2003 07:22 pm, Hare, Matthew wrote:
> I have two systems running SuSE Linux. System 1 is running SuSE 7.1
> with the 2.2.18 kernel. System 2 is running SuSE 7.3 with the
> 2.4.17 kernel. Both systems are PC based (Pentium III, 512MB RAM).
>
>
> When I open a TCP connection from System 1 I get a reported window
> size (I use Ethereal to check window sizes) of 32k. When I do the
> same with System 2 I get a reported window size of 5840bytes and
> the window size increases as the rate of data being sent via TCP
> increases. This is causing me problems, I need a fixed window size
> of 32k on System 2 so that it matches System 1.
>
We've encountered similar behavior on a server running Red Hat 9
starting with the ~5k window size and publishing it is willing to
increase it (forgot the exact name of the flags), problem is the
clients are all w2k systems (for using Chariot as the performance
analyzer), and they don't seem to be able to handle that kind of
window size management, so we're always stuck with the original ~5k
window size and the performance sucks. When using w2k on the same
server, everything starts with 64k window, so the performance is
great.
Isn't there a way to ask the TCP/IP stack not to begin with small
window size and then try to increase, but rather start with the
largest windows size and then decrease ?
Using jumbo frames and TSO doesn't seem to help a lot.
--
| Shmulik Hen Advanced Network Services |
| Israel Design Center, Jerusalem |
| LAN Access Division, Platform Networking |
| Intel Communications Group, Intel corp. |
next parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-12 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E791C176A6139242A988ABA8B3D9B38A0251E6BE@hasmsx403.iil.intel.com>
2003-08-12 16:05 ` Shmulik Hen [this message]
2003-08-11 16:22 TCP/IP Window Size Problem/Query Hare, Matthew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200308121905.18313.shmulik.hen@intel.com \
--to=shmulik.hen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.hare@amsjv.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).