netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@debian.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPsec: add support for Twofish and Serpent
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 13:42:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030815174243.GC3119@imladris.debian.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030814191259.435945cf.davem@redhat.com>

On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 07:12:59PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> I totally disagree, choice is everything.
> 
> That's why we allow NULL crypto algorithms.  Not doing
> so turns this into a political thing, which I decidedly
> do not want our IPSEC implementation to be all about.
>
> And therefore I will add the patch.
>
Thank you, David. I completely agree with allowing users to choose
which algorithms they wish to deploy. 
 
> When using pfkeyv2 sockets, yes you have to assign a number and then
> the APP has to be aware of it.  This just shows how bogus it is to use
> fixed numbers instead of strings to select crypto algorithms.
>
Again, I agree. Especially given the limitations of using the
private ESP id space, since there is no new RFC delegating
additions yet.

Regards,
-- 
Kyle McMartin <kyle@debian.org>
1024D/191FCD8A - 331A 9468 C04D 3A76 5C56  BA68 7EB7 92DF 191F CD8A
2048R/F515317D -   68 A9 0D 28 1B DF 8D 42  0F CC AF 98 A8 D5 A4 04

  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-15 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-14 16:48 [PATCH] IPsec: add support for Twofish and Serpent Kyle McMartin
2003-08-14 18:08 ` Pekka Pietikainen
2003-08-14 20:25   ` Pekka Savola
2003-08-15  2:12     ` David S. Miller
2003-08-15 17:42       ` Kyle McMartin [this message]
2003-08-15 17:34     ` Kyle McMartin
2003-08-15 17:38   ` Kyle McMartin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030815174243.GC3119@imladris.debian.net \
    --to=kyle@debian.org \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).