From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 10:53:07 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20030819105307.0b0a6491.davem@redhat.com> References: <353568DCBAE06148B70767C1B1A93E625EAB5C@post.pc.aspectgroup.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: skraw@ithnet.com, willy@w.ods.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, carlosev@newipnet.com, lamont@scriptkiddie.org, davidsen@tmr.com, bloemsaa@xs4all.nl, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, layes@loran.com, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Richard Underwood In-Reply-To: <353568DCBAE06148B70767C1B1A93E625EAB5C@post.pc.aspectgroup.co.uk> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:56:18 +0100 Richard Underwood wrote: > Which nicely sums up the bug, really. Ok, then how would you propose to be able to send packets out an interface _before_ we have addresses assigned to it? Linux allows that, and in fact it's a useful feature. Consider MSG_DONTROUTE as well. BTW, this ARP source address algorithm we use comes from ipv6, it would be instructive to go and see why they do things the way they do.