From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:11:37 -0700
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <20030819151137.3d6e78f2.davem@redhat.com>
References: <353568DCBAE06148B70767C1B1A93E625EAB60@post.pc.aspectgroup.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, skraw@ithnet.com, willy@w.ods.org,
   carlosev@newipnet.com, lamont@scriptkiddie.org, davidsen@tmr.com,
   bloemsaa@xs4all.nl, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
   linux-net@vger.kernel.org, layes@loran.com, torvalds@osdl.org,
   linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: Richard Underwood <richard@aspectgroup.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <353568DCBAE06148B70767C1B1A93E625EAB60@post.pc.aspectgroup.co.uk>
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 23:12:38 +0100
Richard Underwood <richard@aspectgroup.co.uk> wrote:

> 	I'm certain that Cisco (for example) won't change their ways.

I don't believe this.

In cases where we've been able to show their devices to
be faulty, they've fixed their kit.  Go check out what
happened wrt. the ECN issues their firewall products had.