From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
Subject: Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:15:10 +0200
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <20030819191510.427063fb.skraw@ithnet.com>
References: <353568DCBAE06148B70767C1B1A93E625EAB57@post.pc.aspectgroup.co.uk>
	<070c01c36653$7f3c1ab0$c801a8c0@llewella>
	<20030819095454.4935d48f.davem@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: bloemsaa@xs4all.nl, richard@aspectgroup.co.uk, willy@w.ods.org,
   alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, carlosev@newipnet.com, lamont@scriptkiddie.org,
   davidsen@tmr.com, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
   linux-net@vger.kernel.org, layes@loran.com, torvalds@osdl.org,
   linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030819095454.4935d48f.davem@redhat.com>
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 09:54:54 -0700
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote:

> Which is all irrelevant because the IPv4 RFCs say that host
> based and interface based address ownership are both valid
> system models.

Can you (for completeness) name (the number) or quote the RFC you are talking
about.

Regards,
Stephan