From: Shmulik Hen <shmulik.hen@intel.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@intercode.com.au>
Cc: <bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] convering bonding driver /proc interface to seq_file
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 20:12:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308242012.58116.shmulik.hen@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Mutt.LNX.4.44.0308250112470.21951-100000@excalibur.intercode.com.au>
On Sunday 24 August 2003 06:15 pm, James Morris wrote:
>
> Can you provide a pointer to this code?
>
Please see my email from August 8th with subject:
"[SET 1][PATCH 3/6][bonding] backport 2.6 changes to 2.4"
sent to netdev@oss.sgi.com and bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net.
> seq_file is the standard and preferred way to do this kind of
> thing.
Yes, we know. We wanted to convert to seq_file too, but as it turns
out, in order to create a separate proc file for each bond device you
need to use the PDE(inode) macro which doesn't exist in 2.4 yet.
Since we wanted to maintain compatibility in the bonding module
between 2.4 and 2.6 as much as possible, we figured that as a first
step we'll start using bond_read_proc() instead of bond_get_info() to
allow just that.
BTW, we really like the change from /proc/net/bond0/info to
/proc/net/bonding/bond0. We thought we'll add that into our cleanup
patch set that should come out once the back porting set is accepted.
--
| Shmulik Hen Advanced Network Services |
| Israel Design Center, Jerusalem |
| LAN Access Division, Platform Networking |
| Intel Communications Group, Intel corp. |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-24 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-23 14:25 [PATCH] convering bonding driver /proc interface to seq_file Hen, Shmulik
2003-08-24 15:15 ` James Morris
2003-08-24 17:12 ` Shmulik Hen [this message]
2003-08-25 15:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
[not found] <E791C176A6139242A988ABA8B3D9B38A0251EB62@hasmsx403.iil.intel.com>
2003-08-26 7:45 ` Shmulik Hen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-25 18:43 Hen, Shmulik
2003-08-25 19:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-08-23 13:35 Hen, Shmulik
2003-08-21 23:52 Stephen Hemminger
2003-08-22 0:17 ` James Morris
2003-08-22 0:27 ` Chad N. Tindel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200308242012.58116.shmulik.hen@intel.com \
--to=shmulik.hen@intel.com \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jmorris@intercode.com.au \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).