From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM] a few patches from John Levon
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 17:59:07 -0700
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <20030911175907.0d480a98.davem@redhat.com>
References: <200309041917.h84JHrSa020864@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil, netdev@oss.sgi.com, levon@movementarian.org
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: chas3@users.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <200309041917.h84JHrSa020864@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 15:17:55 -0400
chas williams <chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil> wrote:

> # The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
> # --------------------------------------------
> # 03/09/04	chas@relax.cmf.nrl.navy.mil	1.1422
> # [ATM]: fix atm_dev module refcount bug (from levon@movementarian.org)
> # --------------------------------------------
> #
 ...
> # The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
> # --------------------------------------------
> # 03/09/04	chas@relax.cmf.nrl.navy.mil	1.1422
> # [ATM]: fix atm_dev module refcount bug (from levon@movementarian.org)
> # --------------------------------------------
> #

You're sending double patches again Chas.

This would all actually be easier if you sent each ATM patch in
a seperate email.  When you send them all in one group it's harder
to seperate out each one for discussion or comments.