From: Shmulik Hen <shmulik.hen@intel.com>
To: "Chad N. Tindel" <chad@tindel.net>
Cc: bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
bonding-announce@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
"Noam, Amir" <amir.noam@intel.com>,
"Mendelson, Tsippy" <tsippy.mendelson@intel.com>,
"Noam, Marom" <noam.marom@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Bonding-announce] [PATCH SET][bonding] cleanup
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:11:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200309252011.53960.shmulik.hen@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030925164719.GA45241@calma.pair.com>
On Thursday 25 September 2003 07:47 pm, Chad N. Tindel wrote:
> > patch 4 - remove dead code, old compatibility stuff and redundant
> > checks.
>
> I'm a bit concerned about doing some of this stuff in the 2.4
> series. That compatibility stuff is there for a reason, and was
> set to be removed in 2.6. Perhaps we shouldn't be doing stuff this
> drastic until 2.6 because of the risk of breaking users.
That's the word I got from Jay in response to the " [Kernel-janitors]
old ioctl definitions in 2.5" thread.
>Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> I was going to add it on to the end of the clean up set, but
> if you want to do it, go ahead. Nobody seems to have objected to
> removing the _OLD stuff, which I view as a good thing.
--
| Shmulik Hen Advanced Network Services |
| Israel Design Center, Jerusalem |
| LAN Access Division, Platform Networking |
| Intel Communications Group, Intel corp. |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-25 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-25 12:49 [PATCH SET][bonding] cleanup Shmulik Hen
2003-09-25 16:22 ` Jay Vosburgh
2003-09-25 16:47 ` [Bonding-announce] " Chad N. Tindel
2003-09-25 17:11 ` Shmulik Hen [this message]
2003-09-25 17:33 ` Jay Vosburgh
2003-09-25 17:43 ` Shmulik Hen
2003-09-25 21:13 ` Chad N. Tindel
2003-10-05 22:28 ` Willy TARREAU
2003-10-12 15:48 ` [PATCH SET][bonding 2.4] cleanup - take 3 Shmulik Hen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200309252011.53960.shmulik.hen@intel.com \
--to=shmulik.hen@intel.com \
--cc=amir.noam@intel.com \
--cc=bonding-announce@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=chad@tindel.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=noam.marom@intel.com \
--cc=tsippy.mendelson@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).