From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 64bit bugs in dscc44.c II
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 09:31:53 -0700
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <20031008093153.3daaa6b3.davem@redhat.com>
References: <20031007175953.GA1802@averell>
	<20031008084205.5c81faac.davem@redhat.com>
	<20031008155548.GB16937@wotan.suse.de>
	<20031008090132.2b58c067.davem@redhat.com>
	<20031008160859.GD16937@wotan.suse.de>
	<20031008161149.GA8134@wotan.suse.de>
	<20031008091050.11b2acb7.davem@redhat.com>
	<20031008163345.GA28793@wotan.suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ak@suse.de, ak@muc.de, ncorbic@sangoma.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20031008163345.GA28793@wotan.suse.de>
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:33:45 +0200
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:

> Just do that then when you apply the patch. Would have been faster
> than to write all these emails ;-)

I deleted the original patch, so you have to resend it to
me anyways, so please make the fix I've suggested as you
do this.

When I ask you to do these small fixes, I don't do it to make your
life miserable, I do it because it allows me to review and apply
patches at a higher rate and scale better.