From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 64bit bugs in dscc44.c II Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:33:45 +0200 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20031008163345.GA28793@wotan.suse.de> References: <20031007175953.GA1802@averell> <20031008084205.5c81faac.davem@redhat.com> <20031008155548.GB16937@wotan.suse.de> <20031008090132.2b58c067.davem@redhat.com> <20031008160859.GD16937@wotan.suse.de> <20031008161149.GA8134@wotan.suse.de> <20031008091050.11b2acb7.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andi Kleen , ak@muc.de, ncorbic@sangoma.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031008091050.11b2acb7.davem@redhat.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:10:50AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > BTW my change fixed the warning. > > I know, but it added a new one. > > > It's somewhat ugly to store pointers in unsigned long I agree, > > I have _NO_ problem with this, all I'm asking you to do is: > > - foo = ioremap_nocache(...); > + foo = (unsigned long) ioremap_nocache(...); Just do that then when you apply the patch. Would have been faster than to write all these emails ;-) -Andi