From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:40:25 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20031011124025.6cc2ada8.davem@redhat.com> References: <20031010141646.779f10bb.rddunlap@osdl.org> <20031011120852.13fa8ec4.davem@redhat.com> <20031011194008.GA2395@mars.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rddunlap@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Sam Ravnborg In-Reply-To: <20031011194008.GA2395@mars.ravnborg.org> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:40:08 +0200 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Due to this - the real offender: > > from: net/atm/clip.c: > #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS > #include > #include > #endif That makes a whole lot more sense, here is the fix I just checked in: # This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project: # Project Name: Linux kernel tree # This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher. # This patch includes the following deltas: # ChangeSet 1.1352 -> 1.1353 # net/atm/clip.c 1.26 -> 1.27 # # The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log # -------------------------------------------- # 03/10/11 davem@nuts.ninka.net 1.1353 # [ATM]: Kill PROC_FS ifdef around includes. # -------------------------------------------- # diff -Nru a/net/atm/clip.c b/net/atm/clip.c --- a/net/atm/clip.c Sat Oct 11 12:43:12 2003 +++ b/net/atm/clip.c Sat Oct 11 12:43:12 2003 @@ -24,10 +24,8 @@ #include /* for IFF_UP */ #include #include -#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS #include #include -#endif #include /* for struct rtable and routing */ #include /* icmp_send */ #include /* for HZ */