netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci_get_slot()
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 19:50:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031015185053.GH16535@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031015184104.GA22373@kroah.com>

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:41:04AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> The check of:
> 	if (dev->bus->number == bus && dev->devfn == devfn)
> in pci_find_slot() doesn't check for the domain?

No, it would also need to check pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) .. and it doesn't
have anything to check it against as that information isn't passed into
the function.

> Anyway, is there any other way you can fix this in the tg3 driver only
> for right now?  I agree adding the pci function is "cleaner", but a bit
> late for right now.

The only real way to do it is to inline pci_get_slot() into tg3.  Since I
also have a need for it in sym2, that doesn't seem like a sensible idea.
It would also be racy since it wouldn't take the pci_bus_lock.

> How does this differ from pci_find_slot()?  (becides the pci_dev_get()
> call)?  pci_find_slot() asks for the bus number, which can be determined
> from the pci_bus structure, right?

The pci_bus knows which domain it's in.  We don't have to check it since
we only walk its children.

-- 
"It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk

  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-15 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-15 18:32 [PATCH] pci_get_slot() Matthew Wilcox
2003-10-15 18:41 ` Greg KH
2003-10-15 18:50   ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2003-10-15 19:34     ` Greg KH
2003-10-15 19:55       ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-15 19:13   ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-18  0:24 ` Greg KH
2003-12-18 20:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-01-29 22:46     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031015185053.GH16535@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    --to=willy@debian.org \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).