From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [IPX]: Fix checksum computation.
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:23:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031031132331.35a9aaca.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1067635446.11564.92.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:24:06 -0800
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> Why is this a "fix"? Performance?
> It seems more like someone's idea of code neatening.
IPC checksums were being miscomputed in the original code,
we're as mystified as you are as to why it is that:
if (sum & 0x10000) {
sum++;
sum &= 0xffff;
}
works while:
sum = ((sym >> 16) + sum) & 0xffff;
does not. The theory was that it might be some x86 gcc bug,
but looking at the assembler diff Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
(the appletalk maintainer) showed me between the before and
after:
xorl %eax, %eax
- decl %ecx
movb (%ebx), %al
- incl %ebx
addl %eax, %edx
addl %edx, %edx
- movl %edx, %eax
- shrl $16, %eax
- addl %edx, %eax
- movzwl %ax,%edx
+ testl $65536, %edx
+ je .L982
+ incl %edx
+ andl $65535, %edx
+.L982:
+ decl %ecx
+ incl %ebx
cmpl $-1, %ecx
we still can't see what's wrong.
He did confirm that the change in question makes IPX compute checksums
correctly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-31 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200310312006.h9VK62Hh005910@hera.kernel.org>
2003-10-31 21:24 ` [IPX]: Fix checksum computation Joe Perches
2003-10-31 21:23 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-10-31 21:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-10-31 21:50 ` Joe Perches
2003-10-31 21:53 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-31 22:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-10-31 22:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-11-01 0:25 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-31 21:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-10-31 23:29 ` Mark Huth
2003-11-01 0:31 ` Joe Perches
2003-11-01 0:31 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-31 21:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-11-01 0:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-11-01 1:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-11-01 1:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031031132331.35a9aaca.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).