From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: David S Miller <davem@redhat.com>, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [IPX]: Fix checksum computation.
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 19:56:52 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031031215652.GR3705@conectiva.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1067637004.11564.98.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Em Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 01:50:04PM -0800, Joe Perches escreveu:
> On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 13:23, David S. Miller wrote:
> > we're as mystified as you are as to why it is that:
> > if (sum & 0x10000) {
> > sum++;
> > sum &= 0xffff;
> > }
> > works while:
> > sum = ((sym >> 16) + sum) & 0xffff;
> > does not. The theory was that it might be some x86 gcc bug,
> > but looking at the assembler diff Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > (the appletalk maintainer) showed me between the before and
> > after:
> > xorl %eax, %eax
> > - decl %ecx
> > movb (%ebx), %al
> > - incl %ebx
> > addl %eax, %edx
> > addl %edx, %edx
> > - movl %edx, %eax
> > - shrl $16, %eax
> > - addl %edx, %eax
> > - movzwl %ax,%edx
> > + testl $65536, %edx
> > + je .L982
> > + incl %edx
> > + andl $65535, %edx
> > +.L982:
> > + decl %ecx
> > + incl %ebx
> > cmpl $-1, %ecx
> >
> > we still can't see what's wrong.
> > He did confirm that the change in question makes IPX compute checksums
> > correctly.
>
> If so, something major is WRONG.
I guess so. If people with an Appletalk testbed could try with and without
the patch, that would be great.
> Code all over the place would need this "fix".
Haven't noticed any other place with this problem, but yes, this is something
that may well happen in other code.
> Was an old NG Sniffer being used to verify this?
Nope, MacOS 7.5.5 and 9 just hang when communicating with the machine without
this patch, gcc 3.3.1/2 was used.
> Sniffer had a long term problem with IPX checksums.
I added back the old atalk_checksum from 2.4 and compared the results, not
all were wrong, but some were.
> Has the gcc team been contacted?
Nope, feel free to forward this message.
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-31 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200310312006.h9VK62Hh005910@hera.kernel.org>
2003-10-31 21:24 ` [IPX]: Fix checksum computation Joe Perches
2003-10-31 21:23 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-31 21:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-10-31 21:50 ` Joe Perches
2003-10-31 21:53 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-31 22:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-10-31 22:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-11-01 0:25 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-31 21:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2003-10-31 23:29 ` Mark Huth
2003-11-01 0:31 ` Joe Perches
2003-11-01 0:31 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-31 21:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-11-01 0:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-11-01 1:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-11-01 1:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031031215652.GR3705@conectiva.com.br \
--to=acme@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).