From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [IPX]: Fix checksum computation.
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 20:46:04 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031031224603.GT3705@conectiva.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031031142131.07176dd7.shemminger@osdl.org>
Em Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 02:21:31PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger escreveu:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:53:28 -0800
> "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:50:04 -0800
> > Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Was an old NG Sniffer being used to verify this?
> > > Sniffer had a long term problem with IPX checksums.
> >
> > No, Arnaldo would verify the checksum by running the
> > old code and the new code, they produced different
> > checksums on every sendmsg() call.
> >
> > He then tested it further by making sure he could use
> > netatalk successfully between a 2.4.x Linux appletalk
> > box and a 2.6.x system with the checksum patch applied.
> > Without the patch the 2.4.x system would reject all packets
> > sent by the 2.6.x box.
> >
>
> Actually, the before the "optimization" went in I did testing between
> old 2.4.x and 2.6.x as well as standalone comparisons. The problem is
> a compiler screwup, that probably isn't worth investigating further.
But if someone wants to I'd be glad to receive test reports with and without
the patch.
Hey, that way we can get more testers for Appletalk in 2.6 8)
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-31 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200310312006.h9VK62Hh005910@hera.kernel.org>
2003-10-31 21:24 ` [IPX]: Fix checksum computation Joe Perches
2003-10-31 21:23 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-31 21:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-10-31 21:50 ` Joe Perches
2003-10-31 21:53 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-31 22:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-10-31 22:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2003-11-01 0:25 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-31 21:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-10-31 23:29 ` Mark Huth
2003-11-01 0:31 ` Joe Perches
2003-11-01 0:31 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-31 21:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-11-01 0:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-11-01 1:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-11-01 1:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031031224603.GT3705@conectiva.com.br \
--to=acme@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).