From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: net/core/flow.c cpu handling?
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:11:45 +0000
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <20031103151145.A29287@infradead.org>
References: <20031102062345.A472E2C0CD@lists.samba.org> <20031101225050.4de96a8b.davem@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, anton@samba.org,
        kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031101225050.4de96a8b.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 10:50:50PM -0800
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 10:50:50PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> 
> Very likely, the code is how it is in order to make the
> 2.4.x backport of this code and the 2.6.x version as
> similar as humanly possible.

Well, the current code is wrong for 2.6 and breaks badly for machines
with more than 32/64 cpus.

-- 
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>		-	Freelance Hacker
Contact me for driver hacking and kernel development consulting