netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: jmorris@redhat.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] moving the test for sockaddr->sa_family up
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:44:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031117124443.7590c1d4.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031116190757.GA18416@conectiva.com.br>

On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 17:07:58 -0200
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br> wrote:

> Em Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 08:56:04AM -0500, James Morris escreveu:
> > On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > 
> > > Does anybody see any problem with this simplification? Not for 2.6.0, of
> > > course...
> > 
> > No, looks like a good idea.  Might be able to push address length 
> > verification up there too.
> 
> Not really, look at the ax25 code... :-\ They have to support two address types,
> if we want to keep this flexibility we can't check it at the upper layer,
> does anybody here knows if we want or if we can ditch that thing in ax25? this:

Right, this is the area where you need to be careful, where people
need special semantics just like this ax25 case.

I'm %100 fine with the original cleanup for 2.6.1 or later.

      reply	other threads:[~2003-11-17 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-15 21:20 [RFC] moving the test for sockaddr->sa_family up Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-11-16 13:56 ` James Morris
2003-11-16 19:07   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-11-17 20:44     ` David S. Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031117124443.7590c1d4.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).